Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860706›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2016

Stigma in the context of schools: analysis of the phenomenon of stigma in a population of university students.

Luca Pingani, Sara Catellani, Valeria Del Vecchio, Gaia Sampogna, Sarah E Ellefson, Marco Rigatelli, Andrea Fiorillo, Sara Evans-Lacko, Patrick W Corrigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing Stigma in Media Professionals: Is there Room for Improvement? Results from a Systematic Review.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luca PinganiHuman Resource Development, Local Health Agency of Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Reggio Emilia, Italy. luca.pingani@unimore.it.
Sara CatellaniHuman Resource Development, Local Health Agency of Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, Reggio Emilia, Italy. sara.catellani@unimore.it.
Valeria Del VecchioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, Naples, Italy. valeria.delvecchio78@gmail.com.
Gaia SampognaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, Naples, Italy. gaia.sampogna@alice.it.
Sarah E EllefsonInstitute of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3424 S. State Street, Chicago, USA. sellefso@hawk.iit.edu.
Marco RigatelliDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, Italy. riga@unimore.it.
Andrea FiorilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, Naples, Italy. anfioril@tin.it.
Sara Evans-LackoInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE58AF, UK. sara.evans-lacko@kcl.ac.uk.
Patrick W CorriganInstitute of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3424 S. State Street, Chicago, USA. corrigan@iit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudents have stereotyped views about people with mental illness. In particular, they believe that these persons are incurable, dangerous, unpredictable and responsible for their condition. This study aims to investigate the levels of public stigma in an Italian university population.

methodsThe Attribution Questionnaire 27 - Italian Version (AQ-27-I) was administered to a sample of students from the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. After examining the psychometric characteristics of the AQ-27-I (Cronbach's Alpha and Confirmatory Factor Analysis), multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to identify the predictors of stigmatizing attitudes in this population.

resultsThree hundred and eleven students completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 32.81 % (out of the 948 contacted by email). The AQ-27-I showed good psychometric properties with an α = .68, and the fit indices of the models that partially supported the factor structure and paths. The two variables identified as possible predictors of stigmatizing attitudes (total score of AQ-27-I) were age and time spent reading newspapers.

conclusionsAntistigma campaigns are needed in university contexts, targeted in particular to students in health professions.

Indexed as

AttitudeSocial PerceptionSocial StigmaStereotypingStudents, MedicalAdultDangerous BehaviorFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansItalyMaleMental DisordersNeeds AssessmentPredictive Value of TestsPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID26860706
PMCPMC4748532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.