Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860287›Full record

ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2016

Mucosal vaccine delivery: Current state and a pediatric perspective.

Akhilesh Kumar Shakya, Mohammed Y E Chowdhury, Wenqian Tao, Harvinder Singh Gill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Inverted HA-EV immunization elicits stalk-specific influenza immunity and cross-protection in mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. One year duration of immunity of a combinationFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akhilesh Kumar ShakyaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Mohammed Y E ChowdhuryDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Wenqian TaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Harvinder Singh GillDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. Electronic address: harvinder.gill@ttu.edu.
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

POLLEN GRAINS AS TROJAN HORSES FOR ORAL VACCINATIONDP2HD075691 · NICHD · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, HARVINDER SINGH · 2012 to 2012
$2.2M
Nanoengineered virus-mimics as templates for design of a universal influenza A vaR21AI099575 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, HARVINDER SINGH · 2012 to 2013
$348k
Targeting the oral cavity epithelium for inducing mucosal immunity against HIVR03DE021667 · NIDCR · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, HARVINDER SINGH · 2011 to 2012
$212k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI099575NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD075691NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE021667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most childhood infections occur via the mucosal surfaces, however, parenterally delivered vaccines are unable to induce protective immunity at these surfaces. In contrast, delivery of vaccines via the mucosal routes can allow antigens to interact with the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) to induce both mucosal and systemic immunity. The induced mucosal immunity can neutralize the pathogen on the mucosal surface before it can cause infection. In addition to reinforcing the defense at mucosal surfaces, mucosal vaccination is also expected to be needle-free, which can eliminate pain and the fear of vaccination. Thus, mucosal vaccination is highly appealing, especially for the pediatric population. However, vaccine delivery across mucosal surfaces is challenging because of the different barriers that naturally exist at the various mucosal surfaces to keep the pathogens out. There have been significant developments in delivery systems for mucosal vaccination. In this review we provide an introduction to the MALT, highlight barriers to vaccine delivery at different mucosal surfaces, discuss different approaches that have been investigated for vaccine delivery across mucosal surfaces, and conclude with an assessment of perspectives for mucosal vaccination in the context of the pediatric population.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, OralDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesLymphoid TissuePediatricsVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicDrug CarriersLiposomesVaccinesIntranasal vaccinationMucosal vaccinationNasal vaccinationOral cavity vaccinationOral vaccinationPollen grainsSkin vaccination

Identifiers

PMID26860287
PMCPMC5381653
OpenAlexW2267205758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.