Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860193›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Prediction of anticancer molecules using hybrid model developed on molecules screened against NCI-60 cancer cell lines.

Harinder Singh, Rahul Kumar, Sandeep Singh, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Ankur Gautam, Gajendra P S Raghava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harinder SinghBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. harinder@imtech.res.in.
Rahul KumarBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. rahulk@imtech.res.in.
Sandeep SinghBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. sandysingh@imtech.res.in.
Kumardeep ChaudharyBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. kumardeep@imtech.res.in.
Ankur GautamBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. ankurgautam@imtech.res.in.
Gajendra P S RaghavaBioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. raghava@imtech.res.in.
Institute of Microbial Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn past, numerous quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) based models have been developed for predicting anticancer activity for a specific class of molecules against different cancer drug targets. In contrast, limited attempt have been made to predict the anticancer activity of a diverse class of chemicals against a wide variety of cancer cell lines. In this study, we described a hybrid method developed on thousands of anticancer and non-anticancer molecules tested against National Cancer Institute (NCI) 60 cancer cell lines.

resultsOur analysis of anticancer molecules revealed that majority of anticancer molecules contains 18-24 carbon atoms and are dominated by functional groups like R2NH, R3N, ROH, RCOR, and ROR. It was also observed that certain substructures (e.g., 1-methoxy-4-methylbenzene, 1-methoxy benzene, Nitrobenzene, Indole, Propenyl benzene) are more abundant in anticancer molecules. Next, we developed anticancer molecule prediction models using various machine-learning techniques and achieved maximum matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.81 with 90.40% accuracy using support vector machine (SVM) based models. In another approach, a novel similarity or potency score based method has been developed using selected fragments/fingerprints and achieved maximum MCC of 0.82 with 90.65% accuracy. Finally, we combined the strength of above methods and developed a hybrid method with maximum MCC of 0.85 with 92.47% accuracy.

conclusionsWe developed a hybrid method utilizing the best of machine learning and potency score based method. The highly accurate hybrid method can be used for classification of anticancer and non-anticancer molecules. In order to facilitate scientific community working in the field of anticancer drug discovery, we integrate hybrid and potency method in a web server CancerIN. This server provides various facilities that includes; virtual screening of anticancer molecules, analog based drug design, and similarity with known anticancer molecules ( http://crdd.osdd.net/oscadd/cancerin).

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAnticarcinogenic AgentsCarbonCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyHumansModels, MolecularNeoplasmsSoftwareAnticarcinogenic AgentsCarbon

Identifiers

PMID26860193
PMCPMC4748564
OpenAlexW2265551258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.