ArticleBMC cancer2016
Prediction of anticancer molecules using hybrid model developed on molecules screened against NCI-60 cancer cell lines.
Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- ACLPred: an explainable machine learning and tree-based ensemble model for anticancer ligand prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- UMAP-based clustering split for rigorous evaluation of AI models for virtual screening on cancer cell lines.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- AI-driven discovery of synergistic drug combinations against pancreatic cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- pdCSM-cancer: Using Graph-Based Signatures to Identify Small Molecules with Anticancer Properties.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
- Prognostic biomarkers for predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma patients at high risk using nine genes of apoptotic pathway.PloS one · 2021Article
- A Multi-Objective Approach for Anti-Osteosarcoma Cancer Agents Discovery through Drug Repurposing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Perturbation-Theory Machine Learning (PTML) Multilabel Model of the ChEMBL Dataset of Preclinical Assays for Antisarcoma Compounds.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Active learning effectively identifies a minimal set of maximally informative and asymptotically performant cytotoxic structure-activity patterns in NCI-60 cell lines.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
- Article
- A Hybrid Model for Predicting Pattern Recognition Receptors Using Evolutionary Information.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Effects of green synthesised silver nanoparticles (ST06-AgNPs) using curcumin derivative (ST06) on human cervical cancer cells (HeLa) in vitro and EAC tumor bearing mice models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019Article
- Computational Identification of Inhibitors Using QSAR Approach Against Nipah Virus.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
- Applications of Support Vector Machine (SVM) Learning in Cancer Genomics.Cancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn past, numerous quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) based models have been developed for predicting anticancer activity for a specific class of molecules against different cancer drug targets. In contrast, limited attempt have been made to predict the anticancer activity of a diverse class of chemicals against a wide variety of cancer cell lines. In this study, we described a hybrid method developed on thousands of anticancer and non-anticancer molecules tested against National Cancer Institute (NCI) 60 cancer cell lines.
resultsOur analysis of anticancer molecules revealed that majority of anticancer molecules contains 18-24 carbon atoms and are dominated by functional groups like R2NH, R3N, ROH, RCOR, and ROR. It was also observed that certain substructures (e.g., 1-methoxy-4-methylbenzene, 1-methoxy benzene, Nitrobenzene, Indole, Propenyl benzene) are more abundant in anticancer molecules. Next, we developed anticancer molecule prediction models using various machine-learning techniques and achieved maximum matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.81 with 90.40% accuracy using support vector machine (SVM) based models. In another approach, a novel similarity or potency score based method has been developed using selected fragments/fingerprints and achieved maximum MCC of 0.82 with 90.65% accuracy. Finally, we combined the strength of above methods and developed a hybrid method with maximum MCC of 0.85 with 92.47% accuracy.
conclusionsWe developed a hybrid method utilizing the best of machine learning and potency score based method. The highly accurate hybrid method can be used for classification of anticancer and non-anticancer molecules. In order to facilitate scientific community working in the field of anticancer drug discovery, we integrate hybrid and potency method in a web server CancerIN. This server provides various facilities that includes; virtual screening of anticancer molecules, analog based drug design, and similarity with known anticancer molecules ( http://crdd.osdd.net/oscadd/cancerin).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.