ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017
Comparison of phase dyssynchrony analysis using gated myocardial perfusion imaging with four software programs: Based on the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group normal database.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of PET quantitative methods for myocardial viability assessment in CAD patients and its prognostic value.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Clinical reference values for left ventricular function and synchronicity parameters evaluated by GMPI in patients with a low pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Phase entropy of gated SPECT-MPI for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events: incremental prognostic value beyond perfusion and function.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Volumetric Reference Ranges for SPECT MPI Parameters and the Predictive Power of Dyssynchrony Parameters: A Cross-Sectional StudyCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between an Early Revascularization Strategy and Major Cardiac Events Based on Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients at Intermediate Risk of Major Cardiac Events Using the J-ACCESS Risk Model.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Novel indices representing heterogeneous distributions of myocardial perfusion imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiotoxicity detection tool for breast cancer chemotherapy: a retrospective study.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Comparison of the left ventricular dyssynchrony between stylet-driven and lumen-less lead technique in left bundle branch area pacing using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Incremental prognostic value of stress phase entropy over standard PET myocardial perfusion imaging variables.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- A method using deep learning to discover new predictors from left-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- The assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from gatedJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony induced by exercise stress in patients with normal myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence for nuclear medicine in oncology.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022Review
- Normal and Range Value Evaluations Using Heart Risk View-Function Based on the Japanese Societyof Nuclear Medicine Working Group Database.Annals of nuclear cardiology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Significance of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony Assessed with Nuclear Cardiology for the Prediction of Major Cardiac Events after Revascularization.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- The rate of myocardial perfusion recovery after steroid therapy and its implication for cardiac events in cardiac sarcoidosis and primarily preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Prognostic Value of Phase Analysis for Predicting Adverse Cardiac Events Beyond Conventional Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Variables: Results From the REFINE SPECT Registry.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Observational
- Mechanisms of left ventricular dyssynchrony: A multinational SPECT study of patients with bundle branch block.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with chest pain and normal epicardial coronary arteries.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLeft ventricular (LV) phase dyssynchrony parameters based on gated myocardial perfusion imaging varied among software programs. The aim of this study was to determine normal ranges and factors affecting phase parameters.
methodsNormal databases were derived from the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group (n = 69). The programs were Emory Cardiac Toolbox with SyncTool (ECTb), Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS), Heart Function View (HFV), and cardioREPO (cREPO); parameters of phase standard deviation (PSD), 95% bandwidth, and entropy were compared with parameters with ECTb as a reference.
resultsPSD (degree) was 5.3 ± 3.3 for QGS (P < .0001), 5.4 ± 2.5 for HFV (P < .0001), and 10.3 ± 3.2 for cREPO (P = n. s.) compared with 11.5 ± 5.5 for ECTb. Phase bandwidth with three programs differed significantly from ECTb. Gender differences were significant for all programs, indicating larger variation in males. After adjustment of LV volumes between genders, the difference disappeared except for QGS. The phase parameters showed wider variations in patients with the lower ejection fraction (EF) and larger LV volumes, depending on software types.
conclusionBased on normal ranges of phase dyssynchrony parameters in four software programs, dependency on genders, LV volume, and EF should be considered, indicating the need for careful comparison among different software programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.