Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860095›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

Distress experienced during pediatric VCUGs - a granular, prospective assessment using the brief behavioral distress scale.

Paul G Thacker, Heather R Collins, Jeannie Hill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul G ThackerDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science and Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, MSC 322, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. thackerp@musc.edu.
Heather R CollinsDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, MSC 322, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Jeannie HillDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science and Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, MSC 322, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of decades of experience with the procedure, controversy persists as to the overall distress experienced by children and the routine need for sedation in children undergoing voiding cystourethrograms (VCUG). Many studies have attempted to address these issues, often divided into one camp that champions routine sedation while another group believes that pretest preparation is often all that is needed. At the root of these issues are some of the limitations of previous studies as most incorporate inherently subjective parental questionnaires to determine distress levels rather than using an objective, unbiased observer.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to use a validated and reliable tool (the brief behavioral distress scale) to objectively evaluate the distress experienced during VCUGs. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective study of 26 children (ages 3-7 years old) was performed by the pediatric radiology department at a large urban academic medical center. Patients were evaluated for distress during 12 separate VCUG steps beginning with the patient entering the room and ending with the clothing being replaced at study completion.

resultsUsing a general linear model (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)), significant distress was identified during two phases of the examination, catheter insertion (P-values ranging <0.001-0.19) and the full bladder phase (P-values ranging 0.005-0.043). The mean distress score for catheter insertion (mean: 1.38, standard deviation [SD]: 1.098) was nearly three times higher than the next most distressful step, i.e. full bladder (mean: 0.65, SD: 0.745). Additionally, entering the room was perceived as significantly more distressing than the catheter out (P = 0.016) and clothing replacement phase (P = 0.006).

conclusionWe find that despite there being significantly increased distress during the catheter insertion and full bladder phases, the distress levels during VCUGs are markedly less than in previous reports. Even the most distressful stage, catheterization, was less stressful than previously reported with levels closer to that of minor distress evinced by comfort-seeking behavior from a parent rather than more significant distress resulting in screaming. Our findings corroborate and expand on the conclusion of the effectiveness of pretest preparation and child life specialist involvement.

Indexed as

ChildChild Behavior DisordersChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementProspective StudiesStress, PsychologicalUrinationUrination DisordersUrographyBrief behavioral distress scaleChildrenDistressMidazolamSedationVoiding cystourethrogram

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.