ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2016
Determinants of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Seroprevalence and DNA Prevalence in Mid-Adult Women.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus positivity among Rwandan women living with human immunodeficiency virus.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- The Association between Smoking and Anal Human Papillomavirus in the HPV Infection in Men Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Article
- Tobacco smoke exposure as a risk factor for human papillomavirus infections in women 18-26 years old in the United States.PloS one · 2019Article
- Re-detection vs. new acquisition of high-risk human papillomavirus in mid-adult women.International journal of cancer · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe epidemiology of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infections in mid-adult women is not well understood.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 379 women 30 to 50 years of age. Vaginal samples were tested for type-specific HPV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Sera were tested for type-specific HPV antibodies by Luminex-based assay. Assays included 13 hrHPV types (16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/68). Self-reported health and sexual history were ascertained. Risk factors for seropositivity and DNA positivity to hrHPV were assessed in separate Poisson regression models.
resultsThe mean (SD) age of participants was 38.7 (6.1) years, and the median lifetime number of male sex partners was 7. Approximately two-thirds (68.1%) were seropositive for any hrHPV, 15.0% were DNA positive, and 70.7% were seropositive or DNA positive. In multivariate analyses, women who were married/living with a partner were less likely to be seropositive than single/separated women (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.98). Compared with never hormonal contraceptive users, current (aPR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01-2.29) or former (aPR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10-2.45) users were more likely to be seropositive. Women with a lifetime number of sex partners of 12 or more were more likely to be seropositive compared with those with 0 to 4 partners (aPR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06-1.56). Similar associations were seen with DNA positivity. In addition, there was a positive association between current smoking and hrHPV DNA (aPR vs. never smokers, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.40-4.49).
conclusionsSeventy-one percent of mid-adult women had evidence of current or prior hrHPV infection. Measures of probable increased exposure to HPV infection were associated with both seropositivity and DNA positivity to hrHPV, whereas current smoking was positively associated with hrHPV DNA only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.