Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26859746›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Metastatic Potential and Chemoresistance of Human Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells.

Vikash J Bhagwandin, J Michael Bishop, Woodring E Wright, Jerry W Shay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Role of RNA Splicing in Regulation of Cancer Stem Cell.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Controlling metastatic cancer: the role of phytochemicals in cell signaling.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vikash J BhagwandinDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
J Michael BishopG.W. Hooper Research Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Woodring E WrightDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Jerry W ShayDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSan Francisco Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

THE MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF TUMOR VIRUSEST32CA009043 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BISHOP, J. MICHAEL · 1985 to 2009
$5.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009043NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) typically have the capacity to evade chemotherapy and may be the principal source of metastases. CSCs for human pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) have been identified, but neither the metastatic potential nor the chemoresistance of these cells has been adequately evaluated. We have addressed these issues by examining side-population (SP) cells isolated from the Panc-1 and BxPC3 lines of human PDAC cells, the oncogenotypes of which differ. SP cells could be isolated from monolayers of Panc-1, but only from spheroids of BxPC3. Using orthotopic xenografts into the severely immunocompromised NSG mouse, we found that SP cells isolated from both cell lines produced tumors that were highly metastatic, in contrast to previous experience with PDAC cell lines. SP cells derived from both cell lines expressed the ABCG2 transporter, which was demonstrably responsible for the SP phenotype. SP cells gave rise to non-SP (NSP) cells in vitro and in vivo, a transition that was apparently due to posttranslational inhibition of the ABCG2 transporter. Twenty-two other lines of PDAC cells also expressed ABCG2. The sensitivity of PDAC SP cells to the vinca alkaloid vincristine could be greatly increased by verapamil, a general inhibitor of transporters. In contrast, verapamil had no effect on the killing of PDAC cells by gemcitabine, the current first-line therapeutic for PDAC. We conclude that the isolation of SP cells can be a convenient and effective tool for the study of PDAC CSCs; that CSCs may be the principal progenitors of metastasis by human PDAC; that the ABCG2 transporter is responsible for the SP phenotype in human PDAC cells, and may be a ubiquitous source of drug-resistance in PDAC, but does not confer resistance to gemcitabine; and that inhibition of ABCG2 might offer a useful adjunct in a therapeutic attack on the CSCs of PDAC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGemcitabineHumansMiceNeoplasm TransplantationNeoplastic Stem CellsPancreatic NeoplasmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID26859746
PMCPMC4747523
OpenAlexW2261017702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.