Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26859664›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Simple Scoring System and Artificial Neural Network for Knee Osteoarthritis Risk Prediction: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Tae Keun Yoo, Deok Won Kim, Soo Beom Choi, Ein Oh, Jee Soo Park

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developing an artificial neural network for detecting COVID-19 disease.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Article
  12. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Football Risk Prediction.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Long-term PMScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  20. Machine learning in knee osteoarthritis: A review.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae Keun YooDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Deok Won KimDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Beom ChoiDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ein OhDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Soo ParkDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease of adults worldwide. Since the treatments for advanced radiographic knee OA are limited, clinicians face a significant challenge of identifying patients who are at high risk of OA in a timely and appropriate way. Therefore, we developed a simple self-assessment scoring system and an improved artificial neural network (ANN) model for knee OA.

methodsThe Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (KNHANES V-1) data were used to develop a scoring system and ANN for radiographic knee OA. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of the scoring system. The ANN was constructed using 1777 participants and validated internally on 888 participants in the KNHANES V-1. The predictors of the scoring system were selected as the inputs of the ANN. External validation was performed using 4731 participants in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was calculated to compare the prediction models.

resultsThe scoring system and ANN were built using the independent predictors including sex, age, body mass index, educational status, hypertension, moderate physical activity, and knee pain. In the internal validation, both scoring system and ANN predicted radiographic knee OA (AUC 0.73 versus 0.81, p<0.001) and symptomatic knee OA (AUC 0.88 versus 0.94, p<0.001) with good discriminative ability. In the external validation, both scoring system and ANN showed lower discriminative ability in predicting radiographic knee OA (AUC 0.62 versus 0.67, p<0.001) and symptomatic knee OA (AUC 0.70 versus 0.76, p<0.001).

conclusionsThe self-assessment scoring system may be useful for identifying the adults at high risk for knee OA. The performance of the scoring system is improved significantly by the ANN. We provided an ANN calculator to simply predict the knee OA risk.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysOsteoarthritis, KneePredictive Value of TestsRepublic of KoreaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26859664
PMCPMC4747508
OpenAlexW2273468036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.