ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2016
Anti-inflammatory panacea? The expanding therapeutics of interleukin-1 blockade.
Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Osteoarthritis: molecular pathogenesis and potential therapeutic options.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- From Elixirs to Geroscience: A Historical and Molecular Perspective on Anti-Aging Medicine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Schnitzler syndrome, a rare autoinflammatory disease. Complete response to IL-1 blockade.Clinics and practice · 2017Article
- IL-1 receptor antagonist in sepsis: new findings with old data?Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Natural Compounds as Regulators of NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated IL-1Mediators of inflammationReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewBlockade of interleukin (IL)-1 signaling is one of the oldest biologic therapies, yet the use of these agents is on the rise as the role of IL-1 activation is being recognized in a wide spectrum of inflammatory disorders. This review will cover established and emerging uses of IL-1 antagonism in rheumatic diseases. RECENT
findingsExpanding off-label indications for IL-1 blockade include neutrophil-dominant skin diseases, including pyoderma gangrenosum, hidradenitis supperativa, and pustular psoriasis. There is also increasing evidence for the use of IL-1 blockade in heart failure associated with rheumatic diseases. Somatic mosaicism in NLRP3 may explain the onset of later-in-life presentations of periodic fevers which are responsive to IL-1 blockade. Of importance, clinical response to anti-IL-1 therapy does not always denote protection from autoinflammatory disease complications such as macrophage activation syndrome or amyloidosis. SUMMARY: Indications for IL-1 blocking therapies will likely continue to broaden, but given the rarity of many rheumatic diseases which respond to such treatment, rigorous, large clinical trials for each indication are unlikely to occur. Thus, recommended use of these medications will often fall to the discretion of the astute physician. However, medication cost and hurdles of insurance approval, rather than drug efficacy, may be the primary limitation for more widespread use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.