Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26859436›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2016

Power and the association with relationship quality in South African couples: Implications for HIV/AIDS interventions.

Amy A Conroy, Nuala McGrath, Heidi van Rooyen, Victoria Hosegood, Mallory O Johnson, Katherine Fritz, Alexander Marr, Thulani Ngubane, Lynae A Darbes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy A ConroyCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Electronic address: Amy.Conroy@ucsf.edu.
Nuala McGrathFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 805, South Academic Block, Level C Room AC23, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; Africa Centre for Population Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Mtubatuba, South Africa. Electronic address: n.mcgrath@soton.ac.uk.
Heidi van RooyenSocial, Behavioural and Biomedical Interventions Unit, HIV/AIDS, STIs and Tuberculosis Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, P.O Box 90, Msunduzi 3200, South Africa. Electronic address: hvanrooyen@hsrc.ac.za.
Victoria HosegoodAfrica Centre for Population Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Mtubatuba, South Africa; Division of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. Electronic address: v.hosegood@soton.ac.uk.
Mallory O JohnsonCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Electronic address: Mallory.Johnson@ucsf.edu.
Katherine FritzGlobal Health, International Center for Research on Women, 1120 20th Street NW, Suite 500 North, Washington, D.C., USA. Electronic address: kfritz@icrw.org.
Alexander MarrCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Electronic address: Alexander.Marr@ucsf.edu.
Thulani NgubaneSocial, Behavioural and Biomedical Interventions Unit, HIV/AIDS, STIs and Tuberculosis Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, P.O Box 90, Msunduzi 3200, South Africa. Electronic address: tngubane@hsrc.ac.za.
Lynae A DarbesCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Electronic address: Lynae.Darbes@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
TRAINEESHIPS IN AIDS PREVENTION STUDIEST32MH019105 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Carol Suzanne Camlin, Glenn-Milo Santos · 1989 to 2026
$15.3M
Couples in Context: An RCT of a Couples-based HIV Prevention InterventionR01MH086346 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DARBES, LYNAE A · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246NIMH NIH HHS P30-MH062246NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086346NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH086346NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019105NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH19105Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust ES/J021202/1Wellcome Trust WT082599/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust WT083495MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPower imbalances within sexual relationships have significant implications for HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa. Little is known about how power influences the quality of a relationship, which could be an important pathway leading to healthy behavior around HIV/AIDS.

methodsThis paper uses data from 448 heterosexual couples (896 individuals) in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa who completed baseline surveys from 2012 to 2014 as part of a couples-based HIV intervention trial. Using an actor-partner interdependence perspective, we assessed: (1) how both partners' perceptions of power influences their own (i.e., actor effect) and their partner's reports of relationship quality (i.e., partner effect); and (2) whether these associations differed by gender. We examined three constructs related to power (female power, male equitable gender norms, and shared power) and four domains of relationship quality (intimacy, trust, mutually constructive communication, and conflict).

resultsFor actor effects, shared power was strongly and consistently associated with higher relationship quality across all four domains. The effect of shared power on trust, mutually constructive communication, and conflict were stronger for men than women. The findings for female power and male equitable gender norms were more mixed. Female power was positively associated with women's reports of trust and mutually constructive communication, but negatively associated with intimacy. Male equitable gender norms were positively associated with men's reports of mutually constructive communication. For partner effects, male equitable gender norms were positively associated with women's reports of intimacy and negatively associated with women's reports of conflict.

conclusionsResearch and health interventions aiming to improving HIV-related behaviors should consider sources of shared power within couples and potential leverage points for empowerment at the couple level. Efforts solely focused on empowering women should also take the dyadic environment and men's perspectives into account to ensure positive relationship outcomes.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPower, PsychologicalAdultCommunicationConflict, PsychologicalFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSex FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustYoung AdultCouplesGenderHIV/AIDSPowerRelationship qualitySouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID26859436
PMCPMC4788545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.