Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26859356›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2016

Cell Size Determines the Strength of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint during Embryonic Development.

Matilde Galli, David O Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mitotic Cdc42 waves encode PI(3,4)PScience advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Principles and dynamics of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matilde GalliDepartment of Physiology and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, 600 16(th) Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Electronic address: m.galli@hubrecht.eu.
David O MorganDepartment of Physiology and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, 600 16(th) Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Electronic address: david.morgan@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Regulation of chromosome segregationR01GM094173 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MORGAN, DAVID OWEN · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094173NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM094173NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitotic progression when chromosomes are not properly attached to microtubules of the mitotic spindle. Cells vary widely in the extent to which they delay mitotic progression upon SAC activation. To explore the mechanisms that determine checkpoint strength in different cells, we systematically measured the mitotic delay induced by microtubule disruption at different stages of embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Strikingly, we observed a gradual increase in SAC strength after each round of division. Analysis of mutants that alter cell size or ploidy revealed that SAC strength is determined primarily by cell size and the number of kinetochores. These findings provide clear evidence in vivo that the kinetochore-to-cytoplasm ratio determines the strength of the SAC, providing new insights into why cells exhibit such large variations in their SAC responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell Cycle ProteinsCell SizeChromosome SegregationKinetochoresMicrotubulesM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsSpindle ApparatusCell Cycle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26859356
PMCPMC4748171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.