Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858971›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2016

Early-life Social Adversity and Developmental Processes in Nonhuman Primates.

Jeffrey A French, Sarah B Carp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Female squirrel monkeys' (Animal behaviour · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The evolution of early-life effects on social behaviour-why should social adversity carry over to the future?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey A FrenchDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Sarah B CarpDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
University of Nebraska at Omaha · US

Funding

Parenting, Sibling-Support, and Infant DevelopmentR01HD042882 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI FRENCH, JEFFREY A · 2002 to 2014
$1.7M
Parenting, Sibling-Support, and Infant DevelopmentR56HD042882 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI FRENCH, JEFFREY A · 2008 to 2008
$175k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042882NICHD NIH HHS R56 HD042882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most primate species produce offspring that are altricial and highly dependent upon caregivers. As a consequence, a host of developmental trajectories can be dramatically altered by variation in early experiences. We review the impact of early social experiences (in both experimental models and natural contexts) on developmental profiles in three species of nonhuman primates: marmosets, squirrel monkeys, and macaques. Graded exposure to early-life social adversity (ELSA) produces short- to long-term effects on multiple developmental outcomes, including affect, social behavior, cognitive and attentional processes, and in the neural substrates that underlie these sociobehavioral traits.

Identifiers

PMID26858971
PMCPMC4742359
OpenAlexW2172595581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.