Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2015

Measuring the Mental Health-Care System Responsiveness: Results of an Outpatient Survey in Tehran.

Setareh Forouzan, Mojgan Padyab, Hassan Rafiey, Mehdi Ghazinour, Masoumeh Dejman, Miguel San Sebastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Predictors of poor responsiveness in physical rehabilitation centers in Tehran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Setareh ForouzanDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Umea, Sweden; Social Determinants of Health Research Centre, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mojgan PadyabAgeing and Living Conditions Programme, Centre for Population Studies, Umea University, Umea, Sweden; Department of Social Work, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Hassan RafieySocial Welfare Management Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , Tehran , Iran.
Mehdi GhazinourDepartment of Social Work, Umea University , Umea , Sweden.
Masoumeh DejmanSocial Determinants of Health Research Centre, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Miguel San SebastianDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University , Umea , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As explained by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000, the concept of health system responsiveness is one of the core goals of health systems. Since 2000, further efforts have been made to measure health system responsiveness and the factors affecting responsiveness, yet few studies have applied responsiveness concepts to the evaluation of mental health systems. The present study aims to measure responsiveness and its related domains in the mental health-care system of Tehran. Utilizing the same method used by the WHO for its responsiveness survey, responsiveness for outpatient mental health care was evaluated using a validated Farsi questionnaire. A sample of 500 public mental health service users in Tehran participated and subsequently completed the questionnaire. On average, 47% of participants reported experiencing poor responsiveness. Among responsiveness domains, confidentiality and dignity were the best performing factors while autonomy, access to care, and quality of basic amenities were the worst performing. Respondents who reported their social status as low were more likely to experience poor responsiveness overall. Attention and access to care were responsiveness dimensions that performed poorly but were considered to be highly important by study participants. In summary, the study suggests that measuring responsiveness could provide guidance for further development of mental health-care systems to become more patient orientated and provide patients with more respect.

Indexed as

Iranmental health careoutpatientresponsivenesssocial status

Identifiers

PMID26858944
PMCPMC4728407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.