ReviewFrontiers in oncology2016
Optimizing Cancer Care Delivery through Implementation Science.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of a sexual health clinic in an oncology setting: patient and provider perspectives.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A pre-implementation examination of barriers and facilitators of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Development of an implementation science informed "Test Evidence Transition" program to improve cancer outcomes.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Assessment of Cancer Care Costs in Disease-Specific Cancer Care Pathways.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Harnessing the Synergy Between Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer: A Call to Action.Journal of oncology practice · 2018Article
- Leveraging Implementation Science to Improve Cancer Care Delivery and Patient Outcomes.Journal of oncology practice · 2017Article
- Adoption of Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The 2013 Institute of Medicine report investigating cancer care concluded that the cancer care delivery system is in crisis due to an increased demand for care, increasing complexity of treatment, decreasing work force, and rising costs. Engaging patients and incorporating evidence-based care into routine clinical practice are essential components of a high-quality cancer delivery system. However, a gap currently exists between the identification of beneficial research findings and the application in clinical practice. Implementation research strives to address this gap. In this review, we discuss key components of high-quality implementation research. We then apply these concepts to a current cancer care delivery challenge in women's health, specifically the implementation of a surgery decision aid for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.