Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858730›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Are We on the Right Track: Can Our Understanding of Abscission in Model Systems Promote or Derail Making Improvements in Less Studied Crops?

Sara E Patterson, Jenny L Bolivar-Medina, Tanya G Falbel, Janet L Hedtcke, Danielle Nevarez-McBride, Andrew F Maule, Juan E Zalapa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Calcium Reduces Fruit Abscission inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Allele-Specific Interactions betweenFrontiers in plant science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara E PattersonDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA.
Jenny L Bolivar-MedinaDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI, USA; Vegetable Crops Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research ServiceMadison, WI, USA.
Tanya G FalbelDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA.
Janet L HedtckeWest Madison Agricultural Research Station Verona, WI, USA.
Danielle Nevarez-McBrideDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA.
Andrew F MauleDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA.
Juan E ZalapaDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI, USA; Vegetable Crops Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research ServiceMadison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the world population grows and resources and climate conditions change, crop improvement continues to be one of the most important challenges for agriculturalists. The yield and quality of many crops is affected by abscission or shattering, and environmental stresses often hasten or alter the abscission process. Understanding this process can not only lead to genetic improvement, but also changes in cultural practices and management that will contribute to higher yields, improved quality and greater sustainability. As plant scientists, we have learned significant amounts about this process through the study of model plants such as Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and maize. While these model systems have provided significant valuable information, we are sometimes challenged to use this knowledge effectively as variables including the economic value of the crop, the uniformity of the crop, ploidy levels, flowering and crossing mechanisms, ethylene responses, cultural requirements, responses to changes in environment, and cellular and tissue specific morphological differences can significantly influence outcomes. The value of genomic resources for lesser-studied crops such as cranberries and grapes and the orphan crop fonio will also be considered.

Indexed as

abscissioncranberryfoniograpeseed-shattersheddingtomato

Identifiers

PMID26858730
PMCPMC4726918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.