Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Bacterioplankton Dynamics within a Large Anthropogenically Impacted Urban Estuary.

Thomas C Jeffries, Maria L Schmitz Fontes, Daniel P Harrison, Virginie Van-Dongen-Vogels, Bradley D Eyre, Peter J Ralph, Justin R Seymour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial diversity in the aquatic system in India based on metagenome analysis-a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Salinity as a Determinant Structuring Microbial Communities in Coastal Lakes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas C JeffriesPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology SydneySydney, NSW, Australia; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney UniversityPenrith, NSW, Australia.
Maria L Schmitz FontesPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel P HarrisonSchool of Geosciences, University of Sydney Institute of Marine Science, The University of SydneySydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Institute of Marine ScienceMosman, NSW, Australia.
Virginie Van-Dongen-VogelsPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bradley D EyreCentre for Coastal Management, Southern Cross University Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Peter J RalphPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Justin R SeymourPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AUSouthern Cross University · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abundant and diverse microorganisms that inhabit aquatic systems are both determinants and indicators of aquatic health, providing essential ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling but also causing harmful blooms and disease in impacted habitats. Estuaries are among the most urbanized coastal ecosystems and as a consequence experience substantial environmental pressures, providing ideal systems to study the influence of anthropogenic inputs on microbial ecology. Here we use the highly urbanized Sydney Harbor, Australia, as a model system to investigate shifts in microbial community composition and function along natural and anthopogenic physicochemical gradients, driven by stormwater inflows, tidal flushing and the input of contaminants and both naturally and anthropogenically derived nutrients. Using a combination of amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomics, we observed strong patterns in microbial biogeography across the estuary during two periods: one of high and another of low rainfall. These patterns were driven by shifts in nutrient concentration and dissolved oxygen leading to a partitioning of microbial community composition in different areas of the harbor with different nutrient regimes. Patterns in bacterial composition were related to shifts in the abundance of Rhodobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, Microbacteriaceae, Halomonadaceae, Acidomicrobiales, and Synechococcus, coupled to an enrichment of total microbial metabolic pathways including phosphorus and nitrogen metabolism, sulfate reduction, virulence, and the degradation of hydrocarbons. Additionally, community beta-diversity was partitioned between the two sampling periods. This potentially reflected the influence of shifting allochtonous nutrient inputs on microbial communities and highlighted the temporally dynamic nature of the system. Combined, our results provide insights into the simultaneous influence of natural and anthropogenic drivers on the structure and function of microbial communities within a highly urbanized aquatic ecosystem.

Indexed as

anthropogenic impactsenvironmental microbiologyenvironmental pollutantsestuarine ecologyeutrophicationmetagenomicsmicrobial ecologymicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID26858690
PMCPMC4726783
OpenAlexW2216102923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.