ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016
Macrocognition: From Theory to Toolbox.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family physicians' integration of palliative principles in cirrhosis care: a cognitive task analysis study of symptom management.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Making the best better: performance psychology integrated in special operation forces training.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Gastroscopy for dyspepsia: Understanding primary care and gastroenterologist mental models of practice: A cognitive task analysis approach.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- How Can Authorities Support Distributed Improvisation During Major Crises? A Study of Decision Bottlenecks Arising During Local COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-Out.Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making · 2023Article
- Exploring provider roles, continuity, and mental models in cirrhosis care: A qualitative study.Canadian liver journal · 2023Article
- A hybrid computational approach to anticipate individuals in sequential problem solving.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Foresight for ethical AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Shooter ready? Integrating mental skills training in an advanced sniper course.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Decision-centered design of a clinical decision support system for acute management of pediatric congenital heart disease.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Effect of clinical decision support systems on emergency medicine physicians' decision-making: A pilot scenario-based simulation study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- The 3Ps: A tool for coach observation.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Understanding Clinician Macrocognition to Inform the Design of a Congenital Heart Disease Clinical Decision Support System.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Eliciting and Understanding Primary Care and Specialist Mental Models of Cirrhosis Care: A Cognitive Task Analysis Study.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Article
- Differences in Team Mental Models Associated With Medical Home Transformation Success.Annals of family medicine · 2019Article
- Healthcare information systems: the cognitive challenge.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We trace several trajectories-the evolution of field-based decision making models in the mid-1980s to the formation of the Naturalistic Decision Making movement in 1989, then the further broadening of NDM into Macrocognition in 2003, and finally the transition from macrocognitive models into a set of methods and tools to boost cognitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.