Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858322›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2016

Aging Well: Observations From the Women's Health Initiative Study.

Nancy Fugate Woods, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Barbara B Cochrane, Andrea Z La Croix, Teresa E Seeman, Hilary A Tindle, Oleg Zaslavsky, Chloe E Bird, Karen C Johnson, JoAnn E Manson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Purpose in Life in Older Adults: A Systematic Review on Conceptualization, Measures, and Determinants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resiliency Among Women's Health Initiative Women Aged 80 and Older by Race, Ethnicity, and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Association of Neighborhood Changes with Health-Related Quality of Life in the Women's Health Initiative.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. What Is Successful Aging in Lesbian and Bisexual Women? Application of the Aging-Well Model.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Prospective Association of Social Integration With Life Span and Exceptional Longevity in Women.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Life and Longevity After Cancer (LILAC) Study: Description and Baseline Characteristics of Participants.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nancy Fugate WoodsDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle. nfwoods@uw.edu.
Eileen Rillamas-SunFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Barbara B CochraneDepartment of Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle. The de Tornyay Endowed Professorship in Healthy Aging, de Tornyay Center for Healthy Aging, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle.
Andrea Z La CroixDepartment of Epidemiology, Famiy and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla.
Teresa E SeemanDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
Hilary A TindleDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Oleg ZaslavskyDepartment of Nursing, University of Haifa, Israel.
Chloe E BirdRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Karen C JohnsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
JoAnn E MansonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Maryland.
Judith K OckeneDivision of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Rebecca A SeguinDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Robert B WallaceDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa.

Funding

Women's Health Initiative Clinical Coordinating CenterN01WH22110 · WH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PRENTICE, ROSS L · 2007 to 2010
$22.5M
WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVE-N01WH22110N01WH022110 · WH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ROSS, PRENTICE · 1992 to 2006
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHSPHS HHS 24152PHS HHS 32100-2PHS HHS 32105-6PHS HHS 32108-9PHS HHS 32111-13PHS HHS 32115PHS HHS 32118-32119PHS HHS 32122PHS HHS 42107-26PHS HHS 42129-32PHS HHS 44221WHI NIH HHS N01WH22110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the proportion of the population aged 80 and over accelerates, so does the value of understanding the processes of aging well. The purposes of this article are to: (a) review contemporary theoretical and conceptual perspectives on aging well, (b) describe indicators of aging well that reflect key concepts and perspectives as assessed in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and (c) characterize the status of aging among women aged 80 and older using data obtained from WHI participants at the WHI Extension 2 follow-up.

methodsData from the Lifestyle Questionnaire, which was administered from 2011 to 2012 during the WHI Follow-up Study (Extension 2), were analyzed to provide a profile of the WHI cohort with respect to aging well.

resultsData revealed substantial diversity in the cohort with respect to the various measures of aging well. Although many reported physical functioning levels consistent with disability, most rated their health as good or better. Most reported moderately high levels of resilience, self-control, and self-mastery but lower levels of environmental mastery. Finally, the cohort reported high levels of optimal aging as reflected by their high levels of emotional well-being and moderately high levels of life satisfaction and social support, but more modest levels of personal growth and purpose in life.

conclusionsThe wide range of some dimensions of aging well suggest that further examination of predictors of positive coping and resilience in the face of aging-related disability could identify opportunities to support and facilitate aging well among U.S. women.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAged, 80 and overAgingDisability EvaluationFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Status IndicatorsHealth SurveysHumansPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeSocial SupportUnited StatesEffective agingOptimal agingOptimismPositive agingResilienceSuccessful agingWell-being

Identifiers

PMID26858322
PMCPMC5865531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.