Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858321›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2016

Physical Functioning among Women 80 Years of Age and Older With and Without a Cancer History.

Kathryn E Weaver, Corinne R Leach, Xiaoyan Leng, Suzanne C Danhauer, Heidi D Klepin, Leslie Vaughan, Michelle Naughton, Rowan T Chlebowski, Mara Z Vitolins, Electra Paskett

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathryn E WeaverWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. keweaver@wakehealth.edu.
Corinne R LeachThe American Cancer Society, Behavioral Research Center Atlanta, GA.
Xiaoyan LengWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistical Sciences Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Suzanne C DanhauerWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Heidi D KlepinWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Leslie VaughanWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Michelle NaughtonWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Rowan T ChlebowskiLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance, California.
Mara Z VitolinsWake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Electra PaskettThe Ohio State University, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper OAIC - RenewalP30AG021332 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamie Nicole Justice · 2002 to 2026
$36.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021332PHS HHS 268201100001CPHS HHS 268201100002CPHS HHS 268201100003CPHS HHS 268201100004CPHS HHS 268201100046CPHS HHS 271201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemales 80 years and older comprise 22% of the total U.S. survivor population, yet the impact of cancer on the physical well-being of women is this age group has not been well characterized.

methodsWe compared women, 80 years of age and older in the Women's Health Initiative extension 2, who did (n = 2,270) and did not (n = 20,272) have an adjudicated history of cancer during Women's Health Initiative enrollment; analyses focused on women >2-years postcancer diagnosis. The physical functioning subscale of the RAND-36 was the primary outcome. Demographic, health-status, and psychosocial covariates were drawn from Women's Health Initiative assessments. Analysis of covariance was used to examine the effect of cancer history on physical function, with and without adjustment for covariates.

resultsIn adjusted models, women with a history of cancer reported significantly lower mean physical functioning (56.6, standard error [SE] 0.4) than those without a cancer history (58.0, SE 0.1), p = .002. In these models, younger current age, lower body mass index, increased physical activity, higher self-rated health, increased reported happiness, and the absence of noncancer comorbid conditions were all associated with higher physical functioning in both women with and without a history of cancer.

conclusionsWomen older than 80 years of age with a cancer history have only a moderately lower level of physical function than comparably aged women without a cancer history. Factors associated with higher levels of physical functioning were similar in both groups.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationGeriatric AssessmentWomen's HealthAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHealth StatusHealth SurveysHumansNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurvivorsUnited StatesCancerComorbiditiesPhysical functionSurvivorWomen

Identifiers

PMID26858321
PMCPMC5865535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.