Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26858135›Full record

Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

The added prognostic value of MRI findings for recovery in patients with low back pain in primary care: a 1-year follow-up cohort study.

Evelien I T de Schepper, Bart W Koes, Edwin H G Oei, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Pim A J Luijsterburg

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Predictive value of texture analysis on lumbar MRI in patients with chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Requesting spinal MRIs effectively from primary care referrals.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2016.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evelien I T de SchepperDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.deschepper@erasmusmc.nl.
Bart W KoesDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin H G OeiDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim A J LuijsterburgDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInformation on the prognostic value of MRI findings in low back pain patients in primary care is lacking. The objective of this study is to investigate the added prognostic value of baseline MRI findings over known prognostic factors for recovery at 12-month follow-up in patients with low back pain referred to MRI by their general practitioner.

methodsPatients referred by their general practitioner for MRI of the lumbar spine were recruited at the MRI Center. The questionnaires at baseline and at 3 and 12-months follow-up included potential clinical predictors from history taking and the outcome recovery. The MRI radiology reports were scored. Analysis was performed in 3 steps: derivation of a predictive model including characteristics of the patients and back pain only (history taking), including reported MRI findings only, and the addition of reported MRI findings to the characteristics of the patients and back pain.

resultsAt 12-months follow-up 53% of the patients reported recovery (n = 683). Lower age, better attitude/beliefs regarding back pain, acute back pain, presence of neurological symptoms of the leg(s), and presence of non-continuous back pain were significantly associated with recovery at 12-months follow-up: area under the curve (AUC) 0.77. Addition of the MRI findings resulted in an AUC of 0.78.

conclusionsAt 12-months follow-up, only 53% of these patients with low back pain referred for MRI in general practice reported recovery. Five clinic baseline characteristics were associated with recovery at 12-months follow-up; adding the MRI findings did not result in a stronger prediction of recovery.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLogistic ModelsLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedArea under curveLogistic modelsLow back painLow back pain/diagnosisMagnetic resonance imagingOutcomePredictive value of testsPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID26858135
OpenAlexW2261049438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.