ReviewAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2016
What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews.
Review in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drugs for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Drugs in R&D · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intranasal ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Observational
- Establishing the first ever pediatric procedural sedation clinic in a low-income country: Assessment of the safety and efficacy.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: study protocol for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE).PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Sedoanalgesia in the Debridement of Pediatric Burns in the Emergency Department: Is It Effective and Safe?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Incidence and predictors of respiratory adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation with intramuscular ketamine in a paediatric emergency department.Singapore medical journal · 2022Article
- Success rate of nitrous oxide-oxygen procedural sedation in dental patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2021Review
- Understanding the Process of Procedural Sedation for Orthopedic Injuries in the Pediatric Emergency Department.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Use of ketamine by paediatricians in Italian paediatric emergency departments: a missed opportunity?European journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- Association of Preprocedural Fasting With Outcomes of Emergency Department Sedation in Children.JAMA pediatrics · 2018Article
- The effect of in situ simulation training on the performance of tasks related to patient safety during sedation.Journal of anesthesia · 2018Article
- Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Article
- Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia.Burns & trauma · 2017Review
- Mother-child interactions and young child behavior during procedural conscious sedation.BMC pediatrics · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSedation is increasingly used to facilitate procedures on children in emergency departments (EDs). This overview of systematic reviews (SRs) examines the safety and efficacy of sedative agents commonly used for procedural sedation in children in the ED or similar settings.
methodsWe followed standard SR methods: comprehensive search; dual study selection, quality assessment, data extraction. We included SRs of children (1 month to 18 years) where the indication for sedation was procedure-related and performed in the ED.
resultsFourteen SRs were included (210 primary studies). The most data were available for propofol (six reviews/50,472 sedations) followed by ketamine (7/8,238), nitrous oxide (5/8,220), and midazolam (4/4,978). Inconsistent conclusions for propofol were reported across six reviews. Half concluded that propofol was sufficiently safe; three reviews noted a higher occurrence of adverse events, particularly respiratory depression (upper estimate 1.1%; 5.4% for hypotension requiring intervention). Efficacy of propofol was considered in four reviews and found adequate in three. Five reviews found ketamine to be efficacious and seven reviews showed it to be safe. All five reviews of nitrous oxide concluded it is safe (0.1% incidence of respiratory events); most found it effective in cooperative children. Four reviews of midazolam made varying recommendations. To be effective, midazolam should be combined with another agent that increases the risk of adverse events (upper estimate 9.1% for desaturation, 0.1% for hypotension requiring intervention).
conclusionsThis comprehensive examination of an extensive body of literature shows consistent safety and efficacy for nitrous oxide and ketamine, with very rare significant adverse events for propofol. There was considerable heterogeneity in outcomes and reporting across studies and previous reviews. Standardized outcome sets and reporting should be encouraged to facilitate evidence-based recommendations for care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.