ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2016
Prospective analysis of association between statins and pancreatic cancer risk in the Women's Health Initiative.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Statin use and Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of its Association with Incidence in the General Population and Survival in Patients.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- The Relationship between Statin Intake and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current drug research reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Statins and the risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 2,797,186 patients.Cardiology journal · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals unique and shared antitumor effects of three statins in pancreatic cancer.Oncology reports · 2020Article
- Review
- Prediagnosis Use of Statins Associates With Increased Survival Times of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018Article
- Statin use and pancreatic cancer risk in two prospective cohort studies.Journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Exploring the relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and pancreatic cancer by computed tomographic survey.Internal and emergency medicine · 2018Observational
- An analysis of the association between statin use and risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers in the Women's Health Initiative.Gynecologic oncology · 2018Article
- Effect of Statins on Survival Following Stroke in Patients With Cancer.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Exclusive and Combined Use of Statins and Aspirin and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: a Case-Control Study.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are associated with a lower risk of pancreatic cancer.
methodsThe population included 160,578 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in which 385 incident cases of pancreatic cancer were identified over an average of 8.69 (SD ±4.59) years. All diagnoses were confirmed by medical record and pathology review. Information on statin use and other risk factors was collected at baseline and during follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) evaluating the relationship between prior statin use (at baseline only as well as in a time-dependent manner) and risk of pancreatic cancer were computed from Cox proportional hazards regression analyses after adjusting for appropriate confounders. We also evaluated the effect of statin type, potency, lipophilic status, and duration of use. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsStatins were used at baseline by 12,243 (7.5 %) women. The annualized rate of pancreatic cancer in statin users and nonusers, respectively, was 0.0298 versus 0.0271 %. The multivariable-adjusted HR for statin users versus nonusers at baseline was 0.92 and 95 % CI 0.57-1.48. In a time-dependent model, the HR for low-potency statins was 0.46, 95 % CI 0.20-1.04. There was no significant effect seen by statin lipophilicity or duration of use.
conclusionsThere was no significant relationship between statins and pancreatic cancer risk in the WHI; however, there was a marginal inverse association noted for low-potency statins. Analyses of larger numbers of cases are needed to further explore this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.