Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26857822›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2016

Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties, optic nerve head topographic parameters, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in diabetic and non-diabetic primary open-angle glaucoma.

Serkan Akkaya, Ertuğrul Can, Faruk Öztürk

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neurosurgical Intervention for Nerve and Muscle Biopsies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Serkan AkkayaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, 38010, Kayseri, Turkey. drsakkaya@gmail.com.
Ertuğrul CanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Faruk ÖztürkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the corneal biomechanical properties, optic nerve head (ONH) topographic parameters, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness changes in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with and without diabetes, as well as to evaluate the effect of the metabolic control of diabetes on corneal biomechanical properties, ONH topography, and RNFL thickness. A total of 101 eyes of 101 POAG patients (60 with diabetes and 41 without diabetes) were recruited in this prospective study. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were both measured using the ocular response analyzer. Optic disk parameters were evaluated using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III. RNFL thickness was measured by using Spectralis HRA + OCT. CRF, mean rim area, and rim volume were found to be significantly higher in the diabetic group when compared with non-diabetic group (p = 0.01 for CRF, p = 0.04 for rim area and p = 0.02 for rim volume). ANCOVA analysis showed statistically insignificant effects of age, gender, MD, and PSD values over rim area and rim volume (p > 0.05). CRF was not significantly correlated with HbA1c levels (p > 0.05). Cup area (CA), cup volume (CV), and cup shape measure (CSM) were weakly correlated with HbA1c levels (r = 0.35 and p = 0.006 for CA; r = 0.32 and p = 0.01 for CV; r = 0.32 and p = 0.01 for CSM). The difference in mean RNFL thickness values between the groups was found to be insignificant (p > 0.05). The results of this study raise doubts whether or not diabetes does in fact shield POAG patients from glaucomatous optic nerve damage from various perspectives.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaCorneaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ElasticityFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleGlycated HemoglobinHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanCorneal biomechanicsDiabetesGlaucomaOptic nerve headRetinal nerve fiber

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.