ArticleInternational ophthalmology2016
Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties, optic nerve head topographic parameters, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in diabetic and non-diabetic primary open-angle glaucoma.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta diabetologica · 2020Pooled it
- Influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus on functional progression of primary open-angle glaucoma.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Corneal Structural Alterations Under Chronic Hyperglycemia: Biomechanical and Densitometric Insights in Type 2 Diabetes with and Without Retinopathy.Beyoglu eye journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Neurosurgical Intervention for Nerve and Muscle Biopsies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin use on progression to glaucoma surgery in primary open angle glaucoma.Eye (London, England) · 2024Observational
- Dissecting causal associations of type 2 diabetes with 111 types of ocular conditions: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Corneal endothelium, retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell complex, and perimetry measurements in normal eyes and those with primary open-angle glaucoma.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2022Article
- Association Between Diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy, and Glaucoma.Current diabetes reports · 2021Review
- An Update on Corneal Biomechanics and Architecture in Diabetes.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Review
- Progression of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients.American journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Individual and Combined Effects of Diabetes and Glaucoma on Total Macular Thickness and Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness: A Cross-sectional Analysis.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the corneal biomechanical properties, optic nerve head (ONH) topographic parameters, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness changes in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with and without diabetes, as well as to evaluate the effect of the metabolic control of diabetes on corneal biomechanical properties, ONH topography, and RNFL thickness. A total of 101 eyes of 101 POAG patients (60 with diabetes and 41 without diabetes) were recruited in this prospective study. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were both measured using the ocular response analyzer. Optic disk parameters were evaluated using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III. RNFL thickness was measured by using Spectralis HRA + OCT. CRF, mean rim area, and rim volume were found to be significantly higher in the diabetic group when compared with non-diabetic group (p = 0.01 for CRF, p = 0.04 for rim area and p = 0.02 for rim volume). ANCOVA analysis showed statistically insignificant effects of age, gender, MD, and PSD values over rim area and rim volume (p > 0.05). CRF was not significantly correlated with HbA1c levels (p > 0.05). Cup area (CA), cup volume (CV), and cup shape measure (CSM) were weakly correlated with HbA1c levels (r = 0.35 and p = 0.006 for CA; r = 0.32 and p = 0.01 for CV; r = 0.32 and p = 0.01 for CSM). The difference in mean RNFL thickness values between the groups was found to be insignificant (p > 0.05). The results of this study raise doubts whether or not diabetes does in fact shield POAG patients from glaucomatous optic nerve damage from various perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26857822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.