Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26857818›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

FDG PET/CT as a prognostic biomarker in the era of molecular-targeting therapies: max SUVmax predicts survival of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Noboru Nakaigawa, Keiichi Kondo, Ukihide Tateishi, Ryogo Minamimoto, Tomohiro Kaneta, Kazuhiro Namura, Daiki Ueno, Kazuki Kobayashi, Takeshi Kishida, Ichiro Ikeda and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early assessment withBMC cancer · 2019
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Prognostic Significance ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Non-invasive molecular imaging of kidney diseases.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PET imaging in renal cancer.Current opinion in oncology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Drug discovery and development for rare genetic disorders.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Noboru NakaigawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. nakaigan@med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Keiichi KondoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Ukihide TateishiDepartment of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Ryogo MinamimotoDepartment of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Tomohiro KanetaDepartment of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuhiro NamuraDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Daiki UenoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Kazuki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.
Takeshi KishidaDepartment of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Ichiro IkedaDepartment of Urology, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Hisashi HasumiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Kazuhide MakiyamaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Yoshinobu KubotaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Tomio InoueDepartment of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Masahiro YaoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital · JPYokosuka Kyosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious molecular-targeting therapies have become available for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Accurate prognostication is desirable for choosing the appropriate treatment for individual patients. (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is a non-invasive tool for evaluating glucose accumulation, which can be an index of biological characteristics of cancer. We prospectively evaluated FDG PET/CT as a prognostic indicator in patients with advanced RCC.

methodsA total of 101 patients slated for different systematic therapies for advanced RCC were enrolled between 2008 and 2014. A total of 61 patients had recurrent RCC (58 metastatic and 3 regional) and 40 patients had stage IV RCC (36 metastatic and 4 locoregional). Sixteen patients had not undergone nephrectomy. Pre-treatment FDG PET/CT was performed, and the max SUVmax (the highest SUV measurement in each patient) was recorded. The max SUVmax was compared with different clinical risk factors as prognostic indicators. The median observation period was 18 months (range 1-70 months).

resultsThe max SUVmax of the 101 subjects ranged from undetectable to 23.0 (median 6.9). Patients with high max SUVmax had a poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis with standard risk factors revealed that max SUVmax was an independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.265; 95% confidence interval 1.159-1.380). A cutoff of 8.8 for max SUVmax advocated in our previous report was highly significant (p < 0.0001). When we subclassified the max SUVmax values, the median overall survival of subjects with max SUVmax < 7.0 was 41.9 months. That of subjects with max SUVmax between 7.0 and 12.0 was 20.6 months. That of subjects with max SUVmax ≥ 12.0 was 4.2 months. The differences were statistically significant.

conclusionsPretreatment max SUVmax assessed by FDG PET/CT is a useful prognostic marker for patients with advanced RCC, providing helpful information for clinical decision making.

Indexed as

PrognosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucoseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Glucose

Identifiers

PMID26857818
PMCPMC4746884
OpenAlexW2260269763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.