Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26857705›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

The effect of early postnatal discharge from hospital for women and infants: a systematic review protocol.

Eleanor Jones, Beck Taylor, Christine MacArthur, Ruth Pritchett, Carole Cummins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04422041 (Comparison of Early Versus Very Early Postnatal Discharge on Hospital Readmissions in Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04422041 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Early Versus Very Early Postnatal Discharge on Hospital Readmissions in Newborns: A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonRan2016 to 2018Enrolled354ConditionsHospital Readmission, Newborn Morbidity, Newborn Complication, NewbornArmsTime to discharge less than 24 hours, Discharge time between 24 and 48 hours
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Newborn Length of Stay and Risk of Readmission.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleanor JonesInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. exj480@student.bham.ac.uk.
Beck TaylorInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. R.Taylor.3@bham.ac.uk.
Christine MacArthurInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. C.MACARTHUR@bham.ac.uk.
Ruth PritchettInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. R.V.Blamey@bham.ac.uk.
Carole CumminsInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. C.L.CUMMINS@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe length of postnatal hospital stay has declined over the last 40 years. There is little evidence to support a policy of early discharge following birth, and there is some concern about whether early discharge of mothers and babies is safe. The Cochrane review on the effects of early discharge from hospital only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which are problematic in this area, and a systematic review including other study designs is required. The aim of this broader systematic review is to determine possible effects of a policy of early postnatal discharge on important maternal and infant health-related outcomes. METHODS/

designA systematic search of published literature will be conducted for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBA), and interrupted time series studies (ITS) that report on the effect of a policy of early postnatal discharge from hospital. Databases including Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Science Citation Index will be searched for relevant material. Reference lists of articles will also be searched in addition to searches to identify grey literature. Screening of identified articles and data extraction will be conducted in duplicate and independently. Methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) criteria for risk of bias tool. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or by consulting a third author. Meta-analysis using a random effects model will be used to combine data. Where significant heterogeneity is present, data will be combined in a narrative synthesis. The findings will be reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement. DISCUSSION: Information on the effects of early postnatal discharge from hospital will be important for policy makers and clinicians providing maternity care. This review will also identify any gaps in the current literature on this topic and provide direction for future research in this area of study. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015020545.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPostnatal CarePregnancySystematic Reviews as TopicTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26857705
PMCPMC4746909
OpenAlexW2258652178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.