Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26857427›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

All-optical control of cardiac excitation: combined high-resolution optogenetic actuation and optical mapping.

Emilia Entcheva, Gil Bub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cardiac optogenetics: shining light on signaling pathways.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Guidelines for assessment of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias in small animals.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cardiac optogenetics: a decade of enlightenment.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Syncytium cell growth increases Kir2.1 contribution in human iPSC-cardiomyocytes.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emilia EntchevaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Gil BubDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Cardiac Optogenetics: A Cell Delivery ApproachR01HL111649 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ENTCHEVA, EMILIA · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
Medical Research Council MR/K015877/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac tissue is an excitable system that can support complex spatiotemporal dynamics, including instabilities (arrhythmias) with lethal consequences. While over the last two decades optical mapping of excitation (voltage and calcium dynamics) has facilitated the detailed characterization of such arrhythmia events, until recently, no precise tools existed to actively interrogate cardiac dynamics in space and time. In this work, we discuss the combined use of new methods for space- and time-resolved optogenetic actuation and simultaneous fast, high resolution optical imaging of cardiac excitation waves. First, the mechanisms, limitations and unique features of optically induced responses in cardiomyocytes are outlined. These include the ability to bidirectionally control the membrane potential using depolarizing and hyperpolarizing opsins; the ability to induce prolonged sustained voltage changes; and the ability to control refractoriness and the shape of the cardiac action potential. At the syncytial tissue level, we discuss optogenetically enabled experimentation on cell-cell coupling, alteration of conduction properties and termination of propagating waves by light. Specific attention is given to space- and time-resolved application of optical stimulation using dynamic light patterns to perturb ongoing activation and to probe electrophysiological properties at desired tissue locations. The combined use of optical methods to perturb and to observe the system can offer new tools for precise feedback control of cardiac electrical activity, not available previously with pharmacological and electrical stimulation. These new experimental tools for all-optical electrophysiology allow for a level of precise manipulation and quantification of cardiac dynamics comparable in robustness to the computational setting, and can provide new insights into pacemaking, arrhythmogenesis and suppression or cardioversion.

Indexed as

Electrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacOptogeneticsAnimalsHeartHumans

Identifiers

PMID26857427
PMCPMC4850200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.