ReviewSpinal cord2016
The influence of orthosis options on walking parameters in spinal cord-injured patients: a literature review.
Review in Spinal cord, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The variable stiffness orthosis: customizable mechanics for assistance and rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOrthoses for various joints sections are considered to greatly influence the gait function and energy expenditure in spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients. The aim of this review was to determine the influence of orthoses characteristics and options on the improvement of walking in patients with SCI.
methodsA search was performed using the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICO) method, based on selected keywords; studies were identified electronically in the Science Direct, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Knowledge and PubMed databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was used to report the results. Assessment of the quality of all articles was performed based on the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro scale).
resultsTwelve studies evaluated the effects of different hip joint options on walking parameters and energy expenditure. Five studies investigated the role of knee joint options on gait parameters and compensatory trunk motion. Only five studies analyzed modified ankle joints on gait parameters in SCI patients. Nine studies analyzed gait parameters in SCI patients as powered orthoses and exoskeleton. These studies had a low level of evidence according to the PEDro score (2/10).
conclusionThe various joint types of orthoses appear to be critical in the improvement of walking in patients with SCI. In particular, 'user friendly' orthoses that support the related structure such as the hip joint with a reciprocating mechanism, activated knee joint and movable ankle joint with dorsiflexion assist enable SCI patients to optimize their walking pattern when wearing an orthoses system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26857271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.