Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26856996›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bipolar disorders2016

Harnessing the potential of community-based participatory research approaches in bipolar disorder.

Erin E Michalak, Steven Jones, Fiona Lobban, Guillermo Perez Algorta, Steven J Barnes, Lesley Berk, Michael Berk, Rachelle Hole, Sara Lapsley, Victoria Maxwell and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Functioning Assessment Short Test in Bipolar Disorder.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Erin E MichalakMood Disorders Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2A1, Canada. erin.michalak@ubc.ca.
Steven JonesSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. s.jones7@lancaster.ac.uk.
Fiona LobbanSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. f.lobban@lancaster.ac.uk.
Guillermo Perez AlgortaSpectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. g.perezalgorta@lancaster.ac.uk.
Steven J BarnesDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. sjb@psych.ubc.ca.
Lesley BerkIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. l.berk@deakin.edu.au.
Michael BerkIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia. mikebe@barwonhealth.org.au.
Rachelle HoleCentre for Inclusion and Citizenship, School of Social Work, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. rachelle.hole@ubc.ca.
Sara LapsleyDepartment of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. saralapsley@hotmail.com.
Victoria MaxwellCrazy for Life Co., Sechelt, BC, Canada. victoria@victoriamaxwell.com.
Roumen MilevDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. roumen.milev@queensu.ca.
John McManamyThe Bipolar Expert Series, Alpine, CA, USA. themcman@me.com.
Greg MurrayFaculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia. gwm@swin.edu.au.
Mauricio TohenDepartment of Psychiatry, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. mtohen@gmail.com.
Samson TseDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. samsont@hku.hk.
Manuel Sanchez de CarmonaBipolar Connection Clinic, Mexico City, Mexico. msanchezdecarmona@mac.com.
Sheri L JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. sljohnson@berkeley.edu.
ISBD Taskforce on Community Engagement
CREST.BD
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAMental Health Research UK · GBUniversity of New Mexico · USBarwon Health · AUHong Kong Virtual University · CNMSD (Mexico) · MXQueen's University · CASwinburne University of Technology · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the rapid growth in the sophistication of research on bipolar disorder (BD), the field faces challenges in improving quality of life (QoL) and symptom outcomes, adapting treatments for marginalized communities, and disseminating research insights into real-world practice. Community-based participatory research (CBPR)-research that is conducted as a partnership between researchers and community members-has helped address similar gaps in other health conditions. This paper aims to improve awareness of the potential benefits of CBPR in BD research.

methodsThis paper is a product of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Taskforce on Community Engagement which includes academic researchers, healthcare providers, people with lived experience of BD, and stakeholders from BD community agencies. Illustrative examples of CBPR in action are provided from two established centres that specialize in community engagement in BD research: the Collaborative RESearch Team to study psychosocial issues in BD (CREST.BD) in Canada, and the Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research in the United Kingdom. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We describe the philosophy of CBPR and then introduce four core research areas the BD community has prioritized for research: new treatment approaches, more comprehensive outcome assessments, tackling stigma, and enhanced understanding of positive outcomes. We then describe ways in which CBPR is ideal for advancing each of these research areas and provide specific examples of ways that CBPR has already been successfully applied in these areas. We end by noting potential challenges and mitigation strategies in the application of CBPR in BD research.

conclusionsWe believe that CBPR approaches have significant potential value for the BD research community. The observations and concerns of people with BD, their family members, and supports clearly represent a rich source of information. CBPR approaches provide a collaborative, equitable, empowering orientation to research that builds on the diversity of strengths amongst community stakeholders. Despite the potential merits of this approach, CBPR is as yet not widely used in the BD research field, representing a missed opportunity.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderCommunity-based participatory researchKnowledge translationResearch methods

Identifiers

PMID26856996
PMCPMC4746206
OpenAlexW2260639313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.