ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2016
Effects of Single and Multiple Blood Pressure Measurement Strategies on the Prediction of Prevalent Screen-Detected Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Survey.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mean arterial pressure is not associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a secondary retrospective analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- The effect of high evening blood pressure on obstructive sleep apnea-related morning blood pressure elevation: does sex modify this interaction effect?Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2019Article
- Developing "Aryan:" Diabetes Self-care Mobile Application.International journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Independent and cumulative effects of resting heart rate and pulse pressure with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese rural population.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effects of Single and Multiple Blood Pressure Measurement Strategies on the Prediction of Prevalent Screen-Detected Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Survey.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors investigated the effects of single and multiple blood pressure (BP) measurements during the same encounter on screen-detected diabetes risk. Data for 9018 Cameroonian adults from a community-based survey were used. Resting BP was measured three times 5 minutes apart. Logistic regressions were used to compute the odd ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) higher BP variables. Systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), but not pulse pressure, were related to prevalent diabetes. The highest OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) per SD higher pressure were recorded for MAP (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28) and systolic BP (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.27). Estimates of the association were highest for the first, then third, and lastly the second BP measurements. Estimates from average BP measurements were not better than those from single measurement. Single BP measurement is more effective for diabetes risk screening than multiple measurements. Community-based diabetes strategies utilizing a single measurement are simple without compromising the yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.