Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26856841›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Optimizing the Clinical Use of Vancomycin.

Rocío Álvarez, Luis E López Cortés, José Molina, José M Cisneros, Jerónimo Pachón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Safe and effective use of vancomycin.Australian prescriber · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rocío ÁlvarezClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío-Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Luis E López CortésClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío-Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
José MolinaClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío-Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
José M CisnerosClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío-Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Jerónimo PachónClinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío-Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain pachon@us.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing number of infections produced by beta-lactam-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and the morbidity secondary to these infections make it necessary to optimize the use of vancomycin. In 2009, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Disease Pharmacists published specific guidelines about vancomycin dosage and monitoring. However, these guidelines have not been updated in the past 6 years. This review analyzes the new available information about vancomycin published in recent years regarding pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, serum concentration monitoring, and optimal vancomycin dosing in special situations (obese people, burn patients, renal replacement therapy, among others). Vancomycin efficacy is linked to a correct dosage which should aim to reach an area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of ≥400; serum trough levels of 15 to 20 mg/liter are considered a surrogate marker of an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400 for a MIC of ≤1 mg/liter. For Staphylococcus aureus strains presenting with a MIC >1 mg/liter, an alternative agent should be considered. Vancomycin doses must be adjusted according to body weight and the plasma trough levels of the drug. Nephrotoxicity has been associated with target vancomycin trough levels above 15 mg/liter. Continuous infusion is an option, especially for patients at high risk of renal impairment or unstable vancomycin clearance. In such cases, vancomycin plasma steady-state level and creatinine monitoring are strongly indicated.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26856841
PMCPMC4862470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.