Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26856829›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Assessment of the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network Standardized Procedure for In Vitro Malaria Drug Sensitivity Testing Using SYBR Green Assay for Field Samples with Various Initial Parasitemia Levels.

Agnes C Cheruiyot, Jennifer M Auschwitz, Patricia J Lee, Redemptah A Yeda, Charles O Okello, Susan E Leed, Mayank Talwar, Tushar Murthy, Heather W Gaona, Mark R Hickman and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In-silico analysis of potent Mosquirix vaccine adjuvant leads.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ACS infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnes C CheruiyotDepartment of Emerging Infectious Diseases-Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DEID-GEIS) Program, U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Kenya (USAMRD-K), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jennifer M AuschwitzDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Patricia J LeeDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Redemptah A YedaDepartment of Emerging Infectious Diseases-Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DEID-GEIS) Program, U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Kenya (USAMRD-K), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Charles O OkelloDepartment of Emerging Infectious Diseases-Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DEID-GEIS) Program, U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Kenya (USAMRD-K), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Susan E LeedDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Mayank TalwarDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Tushar MurthyDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Heather W GaonaDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Mark R HickmanDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Hoseah M AkalaDepartment of Emerging Infectious Diseases-Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DEID-GEIS) Program, U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Kenya (USAMRD-K), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Edwin KamauDepartment of Emerging Infectious Diseases-Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DEID-GEIS) Program, U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Kenya (USAMRD-K), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jacob D JohnsonDepartment of Emerging Infectious Diseases-Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DEID-GEIS) Program, U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Kenya (USAMRD-K), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Project, Kisumu, Kenya jacob.d.johnson.mil@mail.mil.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USUnited States Army Medical Research Directorate - Africa · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The malaria SYBR green assay, which is used to profilein vitrodrug susceptibility ofPlasmodium falciparum, is a reliable drug screening and surveillance tool. Malaria field surveillance efforts provide isolates with various low levels of parasitemia. To be advantageous, malaria drug sensitivity assays should perform reproducibly among various starting parasitemia levels rather than at one fixed initial value. We examined the SYBR green assay standardized procedure developed by the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) for its sensitivity and ability to accurately determine the drug concentration that inhibits parasite growth by 50% (IC50) in samples with a range of initial parasitemia levels. The initial sensitivity determination of the WWARN procedure yielded a detection limit of 0.019% parasitemia.P. falciparumlaboratory strains and field isolates with various levels of initial parasitemia were then subjected to a range of doses of common antimalarials. The IC50s were comparable for laboratory strains with between 0.0375% and 0.6% parasitemia and for field isolates with between 0.075% and 0.6% parasitemia for all drugs tested. Furthermore, assay quality (Z') analysis indicated that the WWARN procedure displays high robustness, allowing for drug testing of malaria field samples within the derived range of initial parasitemia. The use of the WWARN procedure should allow for the inclusion of more malaria field samples in malaria drug sensitivity screens that would have otherwise been excluded due to low initial parasitemia levels.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsAtovaquoneBenzothiazolesBiological AssayChloroquineDiaminesDNA, ProtozoanDrug ResistanceErythrocytesFluorescent DyesHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Malaria, FalciparumMefloquineOrganic ChemicalsAntimalarialsartemisininArtemisininsAtovaquoneBenzothiazolesChloroquineDiaminesDNA, ProtozoanFluorescent DyesMefloquineOrganic ChemicalsQuinolinesSYBR Green I

Identifiers

PMID26856829
PMCPMC4808143
OpenAlexW2304133157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.