SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2016
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Infliximab or Cyclosporine as Rescue Therapy in Patients With Severe Ulcerative Colitis Refractory to Steroids.
Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03765450 (Pharmacokinetics of Infliximab and Tumor Necrosis Factor Concentrations in Serum, Stool, and Colonic Mucosa in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pharmacokinetics of Infliximab and Tumor Necrosis Factor Concentrations in Serum, Stool, and Colonic Mucosa in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative outcomes of advanced medical rescue therapies in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in colitis: An updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials (1998 to 2024).Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis.Gastroenterology · 2020Guideline
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Optimal Salvage Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Conventional therapy for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic literature review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Comparable Long-Term Outcomes of Cyclosporine and Infliximab in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2019Guideline
- Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019Guideline
- Pooled analysis of the comparative efficacy between tacrolimus and infliximab for ulcerative colitis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- High Remission Rate with Infliximab and Plant-Based Diet as First-Line (IPF) Therapy for Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Single-Group Trial.The Permanente journal · 2020Trial
- Infliximab versus ciclosporin for steroid-resistant acute severe ulcerative colitis (CONSTRUCT): a mixed methods, open-label, pragmatic randomised trial.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Trial
- Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Older Patient: A Growing Concern.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Upadacitinib as rescue therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis and severe Crohn's disease - current knowledge and future directions.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in 2025 and Beyond.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Inflammatory and Immune Pathways Driving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Resistance in Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Short-term and long-term outcomes of acute severe ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: a multicenter study with pre- and post-biologics comparison.Intestinal research · 2026Article
- Review
- Editorial: Advances in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic findings for cytomegalovirus reactivation in hospitalized patients with ulcerative colitis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC): Clinical Features, Initial Management, and the Role of Advanced Therapies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAcute severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) carries a poor prognosis and requires optimal management. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess cyclosporine and infliximab (IFX) as rescue agents in patients with steroid-refractory UC.
methodsA literature search identified studies that investigated IFX and cyclosporine in steroid-refractory UC patients. The primary outcome was short-term response to treatment. Secondary outcomes included the rates of colectomy at 3 months and 12 months, adverse drug reactions, post-operative complications in those who received rescue therapy but underwent colectomy subsequently, and mortality. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.
resultsOverall, 16 studies with 1,473 participants were eligible for inclusion. Among three randomized controlled trials, no significant difference was seen with IFX compared with cyclosporine with regard to treatment response and 3- or 12-month colectomy. Among 13 non-randomized studies, IFX was associated with significantly higher rates of treatment response (OR 2.96 (95% CI 2.12-4.14, χ(2)=6.50, I(2)=0%)) and a lower 12-month colectomy rate (OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.83, χ(2)=30.94, I(2)=71%)), with no significant difference seen in the 3-month colectomy rate (OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.22-1.28, χ(2)=22.73, I(2)=69%)) compared with cyclosporine. There were no significant differences between IFX and cyclosporine in adverse drug-related events, post-operative complications, or mortality.
conclusionsIn the management of steroid-refractory severe UC, no definitive difference between IFX and cyclosporine is demonstrated by randomized trials, but non-randomized studies suggest that IFX is associated with better treatment response and lower risk of colectomy at 12 months. Prospective studies comparing dose-optimized IFX with cyclosporine are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.