Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26856669›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2016

Influence of durable mechanical circulatory support and allosensitization on mortality after heart transplantation.

Peter Chiu, Justin M Schaffer, Philip E Oyer, Michael Pham, Dipanjan Banerjee, Y Joseph Woo, Richard Ha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pig-to-human heart transplantation: Who goes first?American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Ventricular assist device elicits serum natural IgG that correlates with the development of primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter ChiuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Justin M SchafferDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Philip E OyerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Michael PhamDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Dipanjan BanerjeeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Y Joseph WooDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Richard HaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California. Electronic address: rha@stanford.edu.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationKL2TR001083 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllosensitization has been shown to negatively affect post-heart transplant (HTx) survival even with a negative crossmatch. Whether allosensitization related to mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is associated with worse post-HTx survival remains controversial.

methodsAdult HTx recipients listed in the United Network for Organ Sharing database (July 2006-December 2012) were identified. Multivariate Cox regression assessed the effect of allosensitization on survival. Propensity matching was performed to compare patients who were and were not allosensitized. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared matched and unmatched patients in the MCS and medically managed cohorts.

resultsWe identified 11,840 HTx recipients, of whom 4,167 had MCS. MCS was associated with allosensitization in multivariate logistic regression. Each different MCS device was associated with worse post-HTx survival in multivariate Cox regression. Allosensitization did not predict post-HTx mortality in MCS patients (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.28; p = 0.48. Among patients without MCS, allosensitization was associated with post-HTx mortality (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.39; p = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed equivalent survival in unmatched and matched cohorts when MCS patients who were allosensitized were compared with non-allosensitized MCS patients. Among non-MCS patients, allosensitization was associated with worse survival in unmatched and matched analysis.

conclusionsMCS was associated with allosensitization. For MCS patients, allosensitization did not independently predict worse post-HTx outcome. Among non-MCS patients, allosensitization was associated with worse post-HTx survival. Allosensitization appears to be a heterogeneous process influenced by presence of MCS.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart-Assist DevicesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeheart transplantationmechanical circulatory supportpanel reactive antibodysurvivalventricular assist devices

Identifiers

PMID26856669
PMCPMC4955841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.