Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26856612›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2016

Clinical and Immunological Features of Opsoclonus-Myoclonus Syndrome in the Era of Neuronal Cell Surface Antibodies.

Thaís Armangué, Lidia Sabater, Estefanía Torres-Vega, Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, Helena Ariño, Mar Petit-Pedrol, Jesús Planagumà, Luis Bataller, Josep Dalmau, Francesc Graus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Paraneoplastic syndromes in patients with melanoma.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2024
    Review
  13. Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome Due to Covid-19.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thaís ArmanguéNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lidia SabaterNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Estefanía Torres-VegaService of Neurology, University Hospital Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Eugenia Martínez-HernándezNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Helena AriñoNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mar Petit-PedrolNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús PlanagumàNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis BatallerService of Neurology, University Hospital Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Josep DalmauNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain3Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain4Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylva.
Francesc GrausNeuroimmunology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain5Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ES

Funding

Paraneoplastic Disorders of the CNS: Autoantigen ProfilingR01NS077851 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DALMAU, JOSEP O. · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077851NINDS NIH HHS R01NS077851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceMost studies on opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) in adults are based on small case series before the era of neuronal cell surface antibody discovery.

objectiveTo report the clinical and immunological features of idiopathic OMS (I-OMS) and paraneoplastic OMS (P-OMS), the occurrence of antibodies to cell surface antigens, and the discovery of a novel cell surface epitope. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective cohort study and laboratory investigations of 114 adult patients with OMS at a center for autoimmune neurological disorders done between January 2013 and September 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Review of clinical records. Immunohistochemistry on rat brain and cultured neurons as well as cell-based assays were used to identify known autoantibodies. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry were used to characterize novel antigens.

resultsOf the 114 patients (62 [54%] female; median age, 45 years; interquartile range, 32-60 years), 45 (39%) had P-OMS and 69 (61%) had I-OMS. In patients with P-OMS, the associated tumors included lung cancer (n = 19), breast cancer (n = 10), other cancers (n = 5), and ovarian teratoma (n = 8); 3 additional patients without detectable cancer were considered to have P-OMS because they had positive results for onconeuronal antibodies. Patients with I-OMS, compared with those who had P-OMS, were younger (median age, 38 [interquartile range, 31-50] vs 54 [interquartile range, 45-65] years; P < .001), presented more often with prodromal symptoms or active infection (33% vs 13%; P = .02), less frequently had encephalopathy (10% vs 29%; P = .01), and had better outcome (defined by a modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2 at last visit; 84% vs 39%; P < .001) with fewer relapses (7% vs 24%; P= .04). Onconeuronal antibodies occurred in 13 patients (11%), mostly Ri/ANNA2 antibodies, which were detected in 7 of 10 patients (70%) with breast cancer. Neuronal surface antibodies were identified in 12 patients (11%), mainly glycine receptor antibodies (9 cases), which predominated in P-OMS with lung cancer (21% vs 5% in patients with OMS without lung cancer; P = .02); however, a similar frequency of glycine receptor antibodies was found in patients with lung cancer without OMS (13 of 65 patients [20%]). A novel cell surface epitope, human natural killer 1 (HNK-1), was the target of the antibodies in 3 patients with lung cancer and P-OMS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with I-OMS responded better to treatment and had fewer relapses than those with P-OMS. Older age and encephalopathy, significantly associated with P-OMS, are clinical clues suggesting an underlying tumor. Glycine receptor antibodies occur frequently in P-OMS with lung cancer, but the sensitivity and specificity are low. The HNK-1 epitope is a novel epitope in a subset of patients with P-OMS and lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAntigens, SurfaceAutoantibodiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuronsOpsoclonus-Myoclonus SyndromeRetrospective StudiesAntigens, SurfaceAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID26856612
PMCPMC5823978
OpenAlexW2270269820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.