Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26856348›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2016

PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.

Seong Cheol Oh, Tessa S Cook, Charles E Kahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Generating colloquial radiology reports with large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient Understanding of Oncologic Radiology Reports: Is Access to Electronic Medical Records Helpful?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Creating patient-centered radiology reports to empower patients undergoing prostate magnetic resonance imaging.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Using informatics to engage patients.Pediatric radiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seong Cheol OhDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. scoh40@gmail.com.
Tessa S CookDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Charles E KahnDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To empower patients to participate in their medical care and decision-making, effective communication is critical. In radiology, the clinical report is the primary medium of communication. Although radiologists historically have authored reports with the referring provider as the intended reader, patients increasingly access the reports through portals to electronic health record systems. We developed a system named PORTER (Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporter) to augment radiology reports with lay-language definitions. Our IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study protocol analyzed 100 knee MRI reports from an academic medical center to identify the most commonly utilized terms. A glossary of 313 terms was constructed to include definitions of the terms and, where available, links to reference sources and public-domain images. Flesch-Kincaid readability scores were computed to assure that definitions were readable at or below 10th-grade reading level. The system provided an interactive web site to view outpatient knee MRI exams. After logging in with their exam ID number and date of birth, patients viewed their report annotated with definitions from the glossary. Applicable images were displayed when the user's mouse hovered over a glossary term. This patient-oriented system can help empower patients to better understand their radiology results.

Indexed as

ComprehensionPatient Access to RecordsRadiologyTerminology as TopicAnimalsCommunicationDecision MakingHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansKnee JointMedical RecordsMicePatient ParticipationReadingUnited StatesPatient-centered careQuality improvementRadiology reportingReportingUser interface

Identifiers

PMID26856348
PMCPMC4942390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.