ReviewClinical endoscopy2016
Current Status and Research into Overcoming Limitations of Capsule Endoscopy.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on the association between lymphoid hyperplasia and intussusception in the terminal ileum of children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Galar - a large multi-label video capsule endoscopy dataset.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Review
- Indications and Outcomes of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience in Nairobi, Kenya.Journal of tropical medicine · 2025Article
- Capsule endoscopy for small bowel bleed: Current update.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- A multi-label dataset and its evaluation for automated scoring system for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Intervention: A Clinical Review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2024Review
- Preclinical study of a novel ingestible bleeding sensor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Article
- Application of nanotechnology in the early diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy for small bowel investigation (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Small Bowel Malignancies in Patients Undergoing Capsule Endoscopy for Iron Deficiency Anemia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Diagnostic Yields and Clinical Impacts of Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Current and Newly Proposed Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Reading Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Guidelines for Robotic Flexible Endoscopy at the Time of COVID-19.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Review
- The Modelling, Analysis, and Experimental Validation of a Novel Micro-Robot for Diagnosis of Intestinal Diseases.Micromachines · 2020Article
- A New Active Locomotion Capsule Endoscopy under Magnetic Control and Automated Reading Program.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Changes in performance of small bowel capsule endoscopy based on nationwide data from a Korean Capsule Endoscopy Registry.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020Article
- 3D reconstruction of small bowel lesions using stereo camera-based capsule endoscopy.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic investigation has a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. Since 2001, capsule endoscopy (CE) has been available for small-bowel exploration and is under continuous development. During the past decade, CE has achieved impressive improvements in areas such as miniaturization, resolution, and battery life. As a result, CE is currently a first-line tool for the investigation of the small bowel in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and is a useful alternative to wired enteroscopy. Nevertheless, CE still has several limitations, such as incomplete examination and limited diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. To resolve these problems, many groups have suggested several models (e.g., controlled CO2 insufflation system, magnetic navigation system, mobile robotic platform, tagging and biopsy equipment, and targeted drug-delivery system), which are in development. In the near future, new technological advances will improve the capabilities of CE and broaden its spectrum of applications not only for the small bowel but also for the colon, stomach, and esophagus. The purpose of this review is to introduce the current status of CE and to review the ongoing development of solutions to address its limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.