Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26855905›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2016

Conservative mastectomies and Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction: the DIEP flap.

Maximilian Otte, Carolin Nestle-Krämling, Sonia Fertsch, Mazen Hagouan, Beatrix Munder, Philip Richrath, Peter Stambera, Alina Abu-Ghazaleh, Christoph Andree

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Geisinger MyCodeCase reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximilian Otte1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Carolin Nestle-Krämling1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sonia Fertsch1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mazen Hagouan1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Beatrix Munder1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philip Richrath1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter Stambera1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alina Abu-Ghazaleh1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christoph Andree1 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 2 Department of Senology, Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Verbund Katholischer Kliniken Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of conservative mastectomies, there are an increasing number of women seeking immediate implant based and autologous breast reconstruction. Despite the oncologic safety of the procedures, the focus will be on the timing of reconstruction.

methodsOur plastic surgery unit is focused primarily on autologous breast reconstruction and is part of an interdisciplinary breast center. We offer immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with autologous tissue for patients with positive BRCA 1 and 2, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive cancer without margin problems to the skin, as well as to correct poor oncologic and aesthetic breast conserving therapy (BCT) outcomes. In the majority of cases we prefer an Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction concept with a two-stage procedure.

resultsOver the last 10 years we performed more than 1,600 breast reconstructions with free flaps, performing the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap as our first choice for autologous tissue. We recommend IDEAL breast reconstruction, however approximately 15% of our cases are immediate one stage conservative mastectomies and breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap.

conclusionsFor immediate reconstruction, the aesthetic outcome should not take precedence over oncologic considerations. Immediate one-stage, breast reconstruction with autologous tissue can be offered to the suitable patients which is most likely a healthy women with a small-to-medium sized non ptotic breast receiving a conservative mastectomy. In all other cases, we recommend an IDEAL breast reconstruction approach in order to achieve a final result that is both satisfyingly pleasing and oncologically safe.

Indexed as

deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP flap)immediate-delayed reconstructionMastectomyoncoplastic surgery

Identifiers

PMID26855905
PMCPMC4716867
OpenAlexW2207594006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.