Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26855783›Full record

ArticleBMC hematology2016

Drug-related problems and potential contributing factors in the management of deep vein thrombosis.

Fekede Bekele Daba, Fisihatsion Tadesse, Ephrem Engidawork

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Deep Venous Thrombosis Recurrence and Its Predictors at Selected Tertiary Hospitals in Ethiopia: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fekede Bekele DabaDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Jimma University, P.O. Box 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Fisihatsion TadesseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ephrem EngidaworkDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ETJimma University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients receiving anticoagulant drugs must be carefully screened for drug-related problems, as such medications, including warfarin have narrow therapeutic ranges and a high potential for complications. Thus, this study was designed to assess drug-related problems in the management of patients with deep vein thrombosis at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study involving retrospective chart review of adult patients with deep vein thrombosis was conducted from patients who visited the hospital from July 2012 to June 2013, using structured data collection format and this was complemented by key informant interview.

resultsThe study included 91 patients with venous thromboembolism. Fifty three (58.2 %) were females. Mean age was 38.6 (±13.76) years and more than 2/3 were below the age of 44 years. About 54 % of them presented with concurrent medical conditions and most commonly with cancer. Adjustment of warfarin dose up or down was done in increments of 16 to 100 % for recent subtherapeutic International Normalized Ratios, 16 to 50 % for therapeutic and 11 to 66 % for overtherapeutic International Normalized Ratios, with the mean of 36.5 (±18.03) based on the cumulative weekly dose of warfarin. There was significant linear relationship between percentage of dose change and consequent International Normalized Ratio values (R(2) = 0.419; p = 0.000). Accordingly, more than 51 % of them presented with nontherapeutic International Normalized Ratio ranges following dose adjustment.

conclusionsThe most prevalent anticoagulation drug-related problems were subtherapeutic doses, overtherapeutic doses and potential drug interactions. Institutional validated decision support tools for dosing decisions during maintenance anticoagulation therapy should be developed and used accordingly in order to prevent recurrent and hemorrhagic complications and to improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep vein thrombosisDrug-related problemsInternational Normalized RatioTikur Anbessa Specialized HospitalWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID26855783
PMCPMC4743403
OpenAlexW2268812401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.