Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26855670›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016

Consolidated bioprocessing of Populus using Clostridium (Ruminiclostridium) thermocellum: a case study on the impact of lignin composition and structure.

Alexandru Dumitrache, Hannah Akinosho, Miguel Rodriguez, Xianzhi Meng, Chang Geun Yoo, Jace Natzke, Nancy L Engle, Robert W Sykes, Timothy J Tschaplinski, Wellington Muchero and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Use of the lignocellulose-degrading bacteriumBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Effect of PoplarFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  10. Biotechnology for biofuels · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandru DumitracheBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Hannah AkinoshoBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA ; Renewable Bioproducts Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA ; UT-ORNL Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.
Miguel RodriguezBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Xianzhi MengBioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA ; Renewable Bioproducts Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA ; School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
Chang Geun YooBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA ; UT-ORNL Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.
Jace NatzkeBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Nancy L EngleBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Robert W SykesNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Timothy J TschaplinskiBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Wellington MucheroBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Arthur J RagauskasBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA ; UT-ORNL Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.
Brian H DavisonBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Steven D BrownBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA ; BioEnergy Sciences Center, Bioscience Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USNational Renewable Energy Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher ratios of syringyl-to-guaiacyl (S/G) lignin components of Populus were shown to improve sugar release by enzymatic hydrolysis using commercial blends. Cellulolytic microbes are often robust biomass hydrolyzers and may offer cost advantages; however, it is unknown whether their activity can also be significantly influenced by the ratio of different monolignol types in Populus biomass. Hydrolysis and fermentation of autoclaved, but otherwise not pretreated Populus trichocarpa by Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 was compared using feedstocks that had similar carbohydrate and total lignin contents but differed in S/G ratios.

resultsPopulus with an S/G ratio of 2.1 was converted more rapidly and to a greater extent compared to similar biomass that had a ratio of 1.2. For either microbes or commercial enzymes, an approximate 50 % relative difference in total solids solubilization was measured for both biomasses, which suggests that the differences and limitations in the microbial breakdown of lignocellulose may be largely from the enzymatic hydrolytic process. Surprisingly, the reduction in glucan content per gram solid in the residual microbially processed biomass was similar (17-18 %) irrespective of S/G ratio, pointing to a similar mechanism of solubilization that proceeded at different rates. Fermentation metabolome testing did not reveal the release of known biomass-derived alcohol and aldehyde inhibitors that could explain observed differences in microbial hydrolytic activity. Biomass-derived p-hydroxybenzoic acid was up to nine-fold higher in low S/G ratio biomass fermentations, but was not found to be inhibitory in subsequent test fermentations. Cellulose crystallinity and degree of polymerization did not vary between Populus lines and had minor changes after fermentation. However, lignin molecular weights and cellulose accessibility determined by Simons' staining were positively correlated to the S/G content.

conclusionsHigher S/G ratios in Populus biomass lead to longer and more linear lignin chains and greater access to surface cellulosic content by microbe-bound enzymatic complexes. Substrate access limitation is suggested as a primary bottleneck in solubilization of minimally processed Populus, which has important implications for microbial deconstruction of lignocellulose biomass. Our findings will allow others to examine different Populus lines and to test if similar observations are possible for other plant species.

Indexed as

Clostridium thermocellumConsolidated bioprocessingGuaiacylLigninMolecular weightPopulusS/G ratioSyringyl

Identifiers

PMID26855670
PMCPMC4743434
OpenAlexW2272197616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.