Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26855543›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

One hundred and one over-the-scope-clip applications for severe gastrointestinal bleeding, leaks and fistulas.

Edris Wedi, Susana Gonzalez, Detlev Menke, Elena Kruse, Kai Matthes, Juergen Hochberger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advancing hemostasis: A meta-analysis of novelWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Bleeding malignant gastric ulcer: successful endoscopic hemostasis with an over-the-scope clip.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Edris WediEdris Wedi, Juergen Hochberger, Department of Gastroenterology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil and IHU, Strasbourg University Hospitals, F-67091 Strasbourg, France.
Susana GonzalezEdris Wedi, Juergen Hochberger, Department of Gastroenterology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil and IHU, Strasbourg University Hospitals, F-67091 Strasbourg, France.
Detlev MenkeEdris Wedi, Juergen Hochberger, Department of Gastroenterology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil and IHU, Strasbourg University Hospitals, F-67091 Strasbourg, France.
Elena KruseEdris Wedi, Juergen Hochberger, Department of Gastroenterology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil and IHU, Strasbourg University Hospitals, F-67091 Strasbourg, France.
Kai MatthesEdris Wedi, Juergen Hochberger, Department of Gastroenterology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil and IHU, Strasbourg University Hospitals, F-67091 Strasbourg, France.
Juergen HochbergerEdris Wedi, Juergen Hochberger, Department of Gastroenterology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil and IHU, Strasbourg University Hospitals, F-67091 Strasbourg, France.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the efficacy and clinical outcome of patients treated with an over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) system for severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, perforations and fistulas.

methodsFrom 02-2009 to 10-2012, 84 patients were treated with 101 OTSC clips. 41 patients (48.8%) presented with severe upper-gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, 3 (3.6%) patients with lower-GI bleeding, 7 patients (8.3%) underwent perforation closure, 18 patients (21.4%) had prevention of secondary perforation, 12 patients (14.3%) had control of secondary bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 3 patients (3.6%) had an intervention on a chronic fistula.

resultsIn 78/84 patients (92.8%), primary treatment with the OTSC was technically successful. Clinical primary success was achieved in 75/84 patients (89.28%). The overall mortality in the study patients was 11/84 (13.1%) and was seen in patients with life-threatening upper GI hemorrhage. There was no mortality in any other treatment group. In detail OTSC application lead to a clinical success in 35/41 (85.36%) patients with upper GI bleeding and in 3/3 patients with lower GI bleeding. Technical success of perforation closure was 100% while clinical success was seen in 4/7 cases (57.14%) due to attendant circumstances unrelated to the OTSC. Technical and clinic success was achieved in 18/18 (100%) patients for the prevention of bleeding or perforation after endoscopic mucosal resection and ESD and in 3/3 cases of fistula closure. Two application-related complications were seen (2%).

conclusionThis largest single center experience published so far confirms the value of the OTSC for GI emergencies and complications. Further clinical experience will help to identify optimal indications for its targeted and prophylactic use.

Indexed as

Endoscopes, GastrointestinalSurgical InstrumentsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEquipment DesignFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHemostasis, EndoscopicHumansIntestinal FistulaIntestinal PerforationEndoscopic therapyFistulaGastrointestinal bleedingOver-the-scope-clipPerforation

Identifiers

PMID26855543
PMCPMC4724615
OpenAlexW2418114659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.