Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26855540›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Application of robotics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Baldwin Po Man Yeung, Philip Wai Yan Chiu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Current Status of Robotic Therapeutic Endoscopic Platforms].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of therapeutic digestive endoscopy robots: a narrative review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  8. Robotics in interventional endoscopy-evolution and the way forward.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Flexible robotic endoscopy for treating gastrointestinal neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Soft Robotic Sleeve for Safer Colonoscopy Procedures.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2021
    Article
  15. Closed-loop control of soft continuum manipulators under tip follower actuation.The International journal of robotics research · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Robotic endoscopy. A review of the literature.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2020
    Review
  19. Robotic-assisted surgical endoscopy: a new era for endoluminal therapies.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Baldwin Po Man YeungBaldwin Po Man Yeung, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Philip Wai Yan ChiuBaldwin Po Man Yeung, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Prince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple robotic flexible endoscope platforms have been developed based on cross specialty collaboration between engineers and medical doctors. However, significant number of these platforms have been developed for the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery paradigm. Increasing amount of evidence suggest the focus of development should be placed on advanced endolumenal procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection instead. A thorough literature analysis was performed to assess the current status of robotic flexible endoscopic platforms designed for advanced endolumenal procedures. Current efforts are mainly focused on robotic locomotion and robotic instrument control. In the future, advances in actuation and servoing technology, optical analysis, augmented reality and wireless power transmission technology will no doubt further advance the field of robotic endoscopy. Globally, health systems have become increasingly budget conscious; widespread acceptance of robotic endoscopy will depend on careful design to ensure its delivery of a cost effective service.

Indexed as

Endoscopes, GastrointestinalDiffusion of InnovationEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEquipment DesignGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansPliabilityPredictive Value of TestsRobotic Surgical ProceduresEndoscopesEndoscopic submucosal dissectionMedical devicesNatural orifice endoscopic surgery/instrumentationRobotics/instrumentationRobotic surgeryTherapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID26855540
PMCPMC4724612
OpenAlexW2411011425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.