Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26855248›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2016

Response to Therapy in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naive Patients With Isolated Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Associated Transmitted Drug Resistance.

Dana S Clutter, W Jeffrey Fessel, Soo-Yon Rhee, Leo B Hurley, Daniel B Klein, John P A Ioannidis, Michael J Silverberg, Robert W Shafer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HIV-1 drug resistance and resistance testing.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana S Clutter*Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; †Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA; ‡Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; §Department of Infectious Diseases, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Leandro Medical Center, San Leandro, CA; ‖Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, and ¶Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; and #Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA.
W Jeffrey Fessel
Soo-Yon Rhee
Leo B Hurley
Daniel B Klein
John P A Ioannidis
Michael J Silverberg
Robert W Shafer
National Institutes of Health · USStanford University · US

Funding

PUBLIC HIV DRUG RESISTANCE DATABASER01AI068581 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAFER, ROBERT WILLIAM · 2006 to 2017
$6.2M
Global Epidemiology of Infectious DiseasesT32AI052073 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Angelle Desiree LaBeaud, Stephen Patrick Luby · 2003 to 2026
$4.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068581NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-associated transmitted drug resistance (TDR) is the most common type of TDR. Few data guide the selection of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for patients with such resistance.

methodsWe reviewed treatment outcomes in a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients with isolated NNRTI TDR who initiated ART between April 2002 and May 2014. In an as-treated analysis, virological failure (VF) was defined as not reaching undetectable virus levels within 24 weeks, virological rebound, or switching regimens during viremia. In an intention-to-treat analysis, failure was defined more broadly as VF, loss to follow-up, and switching during virological suppression.

resultsOf 3245 patients, 131 (4.0%) had isolated NNRTI TDR; 122 received a standard regimen comprising 2 NRTIs plus a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI; n = 54), an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI; n = 52), or an NNRTI (n = 16). The median follow-up was 100 weeks. In the as-treated analysis, VF occurred in 15% (n = 8), 2% (n = 1), and 25% (n = 4) of patients in the bPI, INSTI, and NNRTI groups, respectively. In multivariate regression, there was a trend toward a lower risk of VF with INSTIs than with bPIs (hazard ratio: 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 1.1; P = 0.07). In intention-to-treat multivariate regression, INSTIs had a lower risk of failure than bPIs (hazard ratio: 0.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.82; P = 0.01).

conclusionsPatients with isolated NNRTI TDR experienced low VF rates with INSTIs and bPIs. INSTIs were noninferior to bPIs in an analysis of VF but superior to bPIs when frequency of switching and loss to follow-up were also considered.

Indexed as

AdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCaliforniaDrug Resistance, ViralFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26855248
PMCPMC4866916
OpenAlexW2260681270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.