ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2016
Severe Maternal Morbidity and the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Massachusetts.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adverse Newborn Outcomes by Insurance Status Among Patients with Severe Maternal Morbidity in Maryland: 2020-2023.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative risk of gestational diabetes mellitus following fresh and frozen embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study in Palestinian women undergoing in vitro fertilization.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Goal-concordant outcomes in twin pregnancies: impact of chorionicity, fetal weight discordance, and fetal surgery in a 12-year prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Potential risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in females undergoing in vitro fertilization: a pilot study.Clinical diabetes and endocrinology · 2024Article
- The risk of perinatal and cardiometabolic complications in pregnancies conceived by medically assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Severe maternal morbidity in deaf or hard of hearing women in the United States.Preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Maternal education and its association with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in live births conceived using medically assisted reproduction (MAR).Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2023Article
- Maternal comorbidity and adverse perinatal outcomes in survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer: A cohort study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2023Article
- Severe Maternal Morbidity in Twins.American journal of perinatology · 2023Article
- Article
- Pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis and/or ART use: a population-based cohort study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #60: Management of pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- A scoping review of severe maternal morbidity: describing risk factors and methodological approaches to inform population-based surveillance.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2021Article
- Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Hospitalization before and after delivery in fertile, subfertile, and ART-treated women.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine: A 5-year report card on a collaborative effort to address maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Article
- Article
- Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children's study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score-matched cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery differed for women who conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART), those with indicators of subfertility but no ART ("subfertile"), and those who had neither ART nor subfertility ("fertile").
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was part of the larger Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. To construct the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology database and identify ART deliveries, we linked ART treatment records to birth certificates and maternal and infant hospitalization records occurring in Massachusetts between 2004 and 2010. An algorithm of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes identified severe maternal morbidity. We used logistic generalized estimating equations to estimate odds of severe maternal morbidity associated with fertility status, adjusting for maternal demographic and health factors and gestational age, stratifying on plurality and method of delivery.
resultsThe prevalence of severe maternal morbidity among this population (n=458,918) was 1.16%. The overall, crude prevalences of severe maternal morbidity among fertile, subfertile, and ART deliveries were 1.09%, 1.44%, and 3.14%, respectively. The most common indicator of severe maternal morbidity was blood transfusion. In multivariable analyses, among singletons, ART was associated with increased odds of severe maternal morbidity compared with both fertile (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-2.88; cesarean: adjusted OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.98, respectively) and subfertile (vaginal: adjusted OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-3.00; cesarean: adjusted OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.30-2.35, respectively) deliveries. Among twins, only cesarean ART deliveries had significantly greater severe maternal morbidity compared with cesarean fertile deliveries (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.93).
conclusionWomen who conceive through ART may have elevated risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery, largely indicated by blood transfusion, even when compared with a subfertile population. Further research should elucidate mechanisms underlying this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.