Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854928›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2016

Temporal integration of light flashes by the human circadian system.

Raymond P Najjar, Jamie M Zeitzer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01119365 (Bright Light as a Countermeasure for Circadian Desynchrony), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01119365 naunknown statusnot on this map

Bright Light as a Countermeasure for Circadian Desynchrony

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Palo Alto Health Care SystemRan2011 to 2023Enrolled300ConditionsHealthyArmsBright light
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A millisecond parameter space for phase-shifting the circadian pacemaker with near-ultraviolet light.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Human-Centric Lighting Research and Policy in the Melanopsin Age.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raymond P Najjar
Jamie M Zeitzer
Stanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Ultrashort (msec) Light Exposure as a Countermeasure to Circadian DesynchronyR01HL108441 · NHLBI · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI ZEITZER, JAMIE M · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL108441-01A1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeyond image formation, the light that is detected by retinal photoreceptors influences subcortical functions, including circadian timing, sleep, and arousal. The physiology of nonimage-forming (NIF) photoresponses in humans is not well understood; therefore, the development of therapeutic interventions based on this physiology, such as bright light therapy to treat chronobiological disorders, remains challenging.

methodsThirty-nine participants were exposed to 60 minutes of either continuous light (n = 8) or sequences of 2-millisecond light flashes (n = 31) with different interstimulus intervals (ISIs; ranging from 2.5 to 240 seconds). Melatonin phase shift and suppression, along with changes in alertness and sleepiness, were assessed.

resultsWe determined that the human circadian system integrates flash sequences in a nonlinear fashion with a linear rise to a peak response (ISI = 7.6 ± 0.53 seconds) and a power function decrease following the peak of responsivity. At peak ISI, flashes were at least 2-fold more effective in phase delaying the circadian system as compared with exposure to equiluminous continuous light 3,800 times the duration. Flashes did not change melatonin concentrations or alertness in an ISI-dependent manner.

conclusionWe have demonstrated that intermittent light is more effective than continuous light at eliciting circadian changes. These findings cast light on the phenomenology of photic integration and suggest a dichotomous retinohypothalamic network leading to circadian phase shifting and other NIF photoresponses. Further clinical trials are required to judge the practicality of light flash protocols.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01119365.

fundingNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01HL108441-01A1) and Department of Veterans Affairs Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center.

Indexed as

AdultCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMelatoninPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionWakefulnessYoung AdultMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID26854928
PMCPMC4767340
OpenAlexW2273481870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.