Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854755›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2016

Global brain connectivity alterations in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorders.

Kristina C Skåtun, Tobias Kaufmann, Siren Tønnesen, Guido Biele, Ingrid Melle, Ingrid Agartz, Dag Alnæs, Ole A Andreassen, Lars T Westlye

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Dynamics of amygdala connectivity in bipolar disorders: a longitudinal study across mood states.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina C SkåtunFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Tobias KaufmannFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Siren TønnesenFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Guido BieleFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Ingrid MelleFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Ingrid AgartzFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Dag AlnæsFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Ole A AndreassenFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Lars T WestlyeFrom the Norment, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Skåtun, Kaufmann, Tønnesen, Melle, Agartz, Andreassen, Westlye); the Department of Child Development and Mental Health, Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Biele); the Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Agartz); and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Westlye).
Diakonhjemmet Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human brain is organized into functionally distinct modules of which interactions constitute the human functional connectome. Accumulating evidence has implicated perturbations in the patterns of brain connectivity across a range of neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, but little is known about diagnostic specificity. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorders are severe mental disorders with partly overlapping symptomatology. Neuroimaging has demonstrated brain network disintegration in the pathophysiologies; however, to which degree the 2 diagnoses present with overlapping abnormalities remains unclear.

methodsWe collected resting-state fMRI data from patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and from healthy controls. Aiming to characterize connectivity differences across 2 severe mental disorders, we derived global functional connectivity using eigenvector centrality mapping, which allows for regional inference of centrality or importance in the brain network.

resultsSeventy-one patients with schizophrenia, 43 with bipolar disorder and 196 healthy controls participated in our study. We found significant effects of diagnosis in 12 clusters, where pairwise comparisons showed decreased global connectivity in high-centrality clusters: sensory regions in patients with schizophrenia and subcortical regions in both patient groups. Increased connectivity occurred in frontal and parietal clusters in patients with schizophrenia, with intermediate effects in those with bipolar disorder. Patient groups differed in most cortical clusters, with the strongest effects in sensory regions. LIMITATIONS: Methodological concerns of in-scanner motion and the use of full correlation measures may make analyses more vulnerable to noise.

conclusionOur results show decreased eigenvector centrality of limbic structures in both patient groups and in sensory regions in patients with schizophrenia as well as increased centrality in frontal and parietal regions in both groups, with stronger effects in patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBipolar DisorderBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPsychotic DisordersRestSchizophreniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26854755
PMCPMC5008922
OpenAlexW2258068897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.