ReviewBiotechnology advances
Advances in microfluidics in combating infectious diseases.
Review in Biotechnology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual Detection of Canine Monocytic Ehrlichiosis Using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Lateral Flow Biosensors.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Using the power of innate immunoprofiling to understand vaccine design, infection, and immunity.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Review
- Microfluidic Device-Based Virus Detection and Quantification in Future Diagnostic Research: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Current and Future Flow Cytometry Applications Contributing to Antimicrobial Resistance Control.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Internet-of-medical-things integrated point-of-care biosensing devices for infectious diseases: Toward better preparedness for futuristic pandemics.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Single-cell pathogen diagnostics for combating antibiotic resistance.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023Article
- Paper based microfluidic devices: a review of fabrication techniques and applications.The European physical journal. Special topics · 2023Review
- Review
- Transforming Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Precision Public Health: Open Guidelines for Manufacturers and Users.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Current Advancements and Future Road Map to Develop ASSURED Microfluidic Biosensors for Infectious and Non-Infectious Diseases.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Microfluidics Approach to the Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cell Membrane and Their Effect on Blood Rheology.Membranes · 2022Article
- Point-of-care diagnosis of cervical cancer: potential protein biomarkers in cervicovaginal fluid.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2022Review
- Polymeric nanoparticles as therapeutic agents against coronavirus disease.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2022Review
- Micro and Nanoscale Technologies for Diagnosis of Viral Infections.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021Review
- Microfluidic models of the human circulatory system: versatile platforms for exploring mechanobiology and disease modeling.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Microfluidic Platforms to Unravel Mysteries of Alzheimer's Disease: How Far Have We Come?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Microfluidic Tools for Enhanced Characterization of Therapeutic Stem Cells and Prediction of Their Potential Antimicrobial Secretome.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multiplexed detection of respiratory pathogens with a portable analyzer in a "raw-sample-in and answer-out" manner.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2021Article
- Microfluidic enrichment of bacteria coupled to contact-free lysis on a magnetic polymer surface for downstream molecular detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the important pursuits in science and engineering research today is to develop low-cost and user-friendly technologies to improve the health of people. Over the past decade, research efforts in microfluidics have been made to develop methods that can facilitate low-cost diagnosis of infectious diseases, especially in resource-poor settings. Here, we provide an overview of the recent advances in microfluidic devices for point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for infectious diseases and emphasis is placed on malaria, sepsis and AIDS/HIV. Other infectious diseases such as SARS, tuberculosis, and dengue are also briefly discussed. These infectious diseases are chosen as they contribute the most to disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The current state of research in this area is evaluated and projection toward future applications and accompanying challenges are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.