Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854604›Full record

ArticleWater research2016

Electrochemical disinfection of toilet wastewater using wastewater electrolysis cell.

Xiao Huang, Yan Qu, Clément A Cid, Cody Finke, Michael R Hoffmann, Keahying Lim, Sunny C Jiang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding the Catalytic Active Sites of Crystalline CoSbACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Article
  5. Technologies for pollutant removal and resource recovery from blackwater: a review.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Optimal design of an electrochemical reactor for blackwater treatment.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao HuangCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
Yan QuLinde+Robinson Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Clément A CidLinde+Robinson Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Cody FinkeLinde+Robinson Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Michael R HoffmannLinde+Robinson Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Keahying LimCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
Sunny C JiangCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States. Electronic address: sjiang@uci.edu.
Linde (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paucity of proper sanitation facilities has contributed to the spread of waterborne diseases in many developing countries. The primary goal of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using a wastewater electrolysis cell (WEC) for toilet wastewater disinfection. The treated wastewater was designed to reuse for toilet flushing and agricultural irrigation. Laboratory-scale electrochemical (EC) disinfection experiments were performed to investigate the disinfection efficiency of the WEC with four seeded microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, recombinant adenovirus serotype 5, and bacteriophage MS2). In addition, the formation of organic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAA5) at the end of the EC treatment was also investigated. The results showed that at an applied cell voltage of +4 V, the WEC achieved 5-log10 reductions of all four seeded microorganisms in real toilet wastewater within 60 min. In contrast, chemical chlorination (CC) disinfection using hypochlorite [NaClO] was only effective for the inactivation of bacteria. Due to the rapid formation of chloramines, less than 0.5-log10 reduction of MS2 was observed in toilet wastewater even at the highest [NaClO] dosage (36 mg/L, as Cl2) over a 1 h reaction. Experiments using laboratory model waters showed that free reactive chlorine generated in situ during EC disinfection process was the main disinfectant responsible for the inactivation of microorganisms. However, the production of hydroxyl radicals [OH], and other reactive oxygen species by the active bismuth-doped TiO2 anode were negligible under the same electrolytic conditions. The formation of THMs and HAA5 were found to increase with higher applied cell voltage. Based on the energy consumption estimates, the WEC system can be operated using solar energy stored in a DC battery as the sole power source.

Indexed as

BacteriaDisinfectionElectrochemistryElectrolysisHalogenationKineticsLevivirusOxidantsSolar EnergyTrihalomethanesWastewaterOxidantsTrihalomethanesWastewaterDisinfection byproductsElectrochemical disinfectionMicrobial pathogensSolar energyToilet wastewaterWastewater electrolysis cell

Identifiers

PMID26854604
PMCPMC4773403
OpenAlexW2274310910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.