Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854532›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2016

The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.

A Caglar Tas, Steven J Luck, Andrew Hollingworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Oculomotor rehearsal in visuospatial working memory.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamic in-flight shifts of working memory resources across saccades.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Visual short-term memory for overtly attended objects during infancy.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Caglar TasDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-0040
Steven J LuckCenter for Mind and Brain and Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Andrew HollingworthDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iow.

Funding

Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention in SchizophreniaR01MH065034 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI James M. Gold, STEVEN J LUCK · 2001 to 2026
$13.9M
Visual Working Memory: Representation and ProcessR01MH076226 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LUCK, STEVEN J · 2006 to 2020
$4.5M
Eye Movements, Gaze Correction, and Visual Short-Term MemoryR01EY017356 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOLLINGWORTH, ANDREW R · 2006 to 2014
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017356NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065034NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial debate over whether visual working memory (VWM) and visual attention constitute a single system for the selection of task-relevant perceptual information or whether they are distinct systems that can be dissociated when their representational demands diverge. In the present study, we focused on the relationship between visual attention and the encoding of objects into VWM. Participants performed a color change-detection task. During the retention interval, a secondary object, irrelevant to the memory task, was presented. Participants were instructed either to execute an overt shift of gaze to this object (Experiments 1-3) or to attend it covertly (Experiments 4 and 5). Our goal was to determine whether these overt and covert shifts of attention disrupted the information held in VWM. We hypothesized that saccades, which typically introduce a memorial demand to bridge perceptual disruption, would lead to automatic encoding of the secondary object. However, purely covert shifts of attention, which introduce no such demand, would not result in automatic memory encoding. The results supported these predictions. Saccades to the secondary object produced substantial interference with VWM performance, but covert shifts of attention to this object produced no interference with VWM performance. These results challenge prevailing theories that consider attention and VWM to reflect a common mechanism. In addition, they indicate that the relationship between attention and VWM is dependent on the memorial demands of the orienting behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AdultAttentionColor PerceptionHumansMemory, Short-TermSaccadesVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26854532
PMCPMC4977214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.