Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854395›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

Nausea in pregnancy: attitudes among pregnant women and general practitioners on treatment and pregnancy care.

Kristine Heitmann, Hans Christian Svendsen, Ingvild H Sporsheim, Lone Holst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bioavailability of CaribanDrugs in R&D · 2023
    Article
  8. Women's Health and Working Life: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. The relation of visfatin with nausea and vomiting in the pregnancy.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristine Heitmanna Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway ;
Hans Christian Svendsena Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway ;
Ingvild H Sporsheima Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway ;
Lone Holsta Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway ;
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) is very common, and may have great impact on a woman's life. The aim of this study was to explore thoughts and attitudes among Norwegian pregnant women and GPs on treatment of NVP and pregnancy care.

designFocus-group study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Separate focus-group discussions were conducted with pregnant women and GPs.

resultsTwo focus-group discussions were conducted with pregnant women and two with GPs. The GPs thought it was important to normalize NVP symptoms. However, the women felt their distress due to NVP was trivialized by the GPs. The women were sceptical towards the use of medicines while pregnant, and avoidance was sought despite being ill. The GPs appeared uncertain with respect to medical treatment of NVP, which was stated to be considered only after progression to quite severe symptoms. Sick leave seemed to be an important part of the treatment regime applied by the GPs. The women had good experiences with graded sick leave.

conclusionThis Norwegian study identifies attitudes among GPs and pregnant women that may act as obstacles to appropriate care for women with NVP. The pregnant women and the GPs seemed to talk at cross-purposes; GPs' normalization of the symptoms made the women feel that their distress due to NVP was trivialized by the GPs. Our results indicate that pregnant women with NVP requiring medical treatment probably need comprehensive and reassuring information about treatment options before considering using any medicines. KEY POINTS: Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) is very common, and considered to be of clinical significance for 35% of women. While the GPs agreed on the importance of normalizing the symptoms, the women felt their distress was trivialized, and missed being properly evaluated. Both the GPs and the women showed a reluctant attitude to medical treatment of NVP. The GPs gave the impression of considering medical treatment only after progression of symptoms to becoming quite severe.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthGeneral PractitionersNauseaPhysician-Patient RelationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAdultFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient SatisfactionPregnancyGeneral practicemorning sicknessnauseaNorwaypregnancytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID26854395
PMCPMC4911029
OpenAlexW2331708960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.