Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854147›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review.

Emma Elizabeth Ilett, Seppo W Langer, Ingrid Holst Olsen, Birgitte Federspiel, Andreas Kjær, Ulrich Knigge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Multifocal diffuse large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma Elizabeth IlettNeuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. ilett@sund.ku.dk.
Seppo W LangerNeuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. seppo.langer@regionh.dk.
Ingrid Holst OlsenNeuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte FederspielNeuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. birgitte.federspiel@regionh.dk.
Andreas KjærNeuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. andreas.kjaer@regionh.dk.
Ulrich KniggeNeuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. ulrich.peter.knigge@regionh.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, empirical literature has generally been considered lacking in relation to neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the highly malignant subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are often found in the lungs or the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system and can be of small or large cell type. Concentrating on GEP-NECs, we can conclude that survival times are poor, with a median of only 4-16 months depending on disease stage and primary site. Further, this aggressive disease appears to be on the rise, with incidence numbers increasing while survival times are stagnant. Treatment strategies concerning surgery are often undecided and second-line chemotherapy is not yet established. After an analysis of over 2600 articles, we can conclude that there is indeed more empirical literature concerning GEP-NECs available than previously assumed. This unique review is based on 333 selected articles and contains detailed information concerning all aspects of GEP-NECs. Namely, the classification, histology, genetic abnormalities, epidemiology, origin, biochemistry, imaging, treatment and survival of GEP-NECs are described. Also, organ-specific summaries with more detail in relation to disease presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival are presented. Finally, key points are discussed with directions for future research priorities.

Indexed as

colo-rectalKi-67 indexlarge cell carcinomasneuroendocrine carcinomasneuroendocrine neoplasmsneuroendocrine tumoursoesophaguspancreassmall cell carcinomasstomach

Identifiers

PMID26854147
PMCPMC4665594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.